This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

LPC Law Notes Criminal Litigation Notes

Structuring A Plea In Mitigation Notes

Updated Structuring A Plea In Mitigation Notes

Criminal Litigation Notes

Criminal Litigation

Approximately 143 pages

A collection of the best LPC Criminal Litigation notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find after combing through dozens of LPC samples from outstanding students with the highest results in England and carefully evaluating each on accuracy, formatting, logical structure, spelling/grammar, conciseness and "wow-factor".

In short these are what we believe to be the strongest set of Criminal Lit notes available in the UK this year. This collection of notes is fully up...

Available here

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Criminal Litigation Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Purpose of Sentencing

(s.142 CJA)

P.240

  1. Punishment (deterrence)

  2. Reduction of crime (reduction by deterrence)

  3. Rehabilitation of offenders

  4. Protection of the public

  5. Reparation

Step 1:

The Objective

Identify the Starting Point of Sentencing

P.264

  • Establish your Objective: if found guilty, we will want D to have the most lenient sentence possible

  • Default Sentence: the Magistrates Court Sentencing Guidelines suggest that for an offence of theft from a shop that has little or no planning or sophistication and the good stolen are of low value (which the charge of thieving a pair of 79.99 jeans is), then then:

    • starting point: Band B fine (75%-125% D’s weekly income starting at 100%)

    • ranging to: conditional discharge or a low level community order

Step 3:

“the Offence”

Minimise the Impact of Aggravating Factors

P.265

Statutory

  • The court must treat the offence as more serious where previous convictions are present (s.143(2))

  • On the facts, the convictions dated 10/03/09, 12/12/09, 29/03/10 and 29/12/10 are all spent, and therefore the defence will argue that they are not aggravating factors

  • The convictions on 10/01/10 will be taken into consideration and could have an adverse effect on Daisy’s sentencing. The defence should argue that the situations surrounding Daisy now are different to when she was convicted for those offences (i.e. in rehab, no longer in that relationship, not on drugs, has a new boyfriend, has a child on the way)

Guidelines

  • None of the aggravating factors in the Sentencing Guidelines apply to Daisy’s case, i.e.:

    • When committing the offence, a child was not with her

    • Daisy was not subject to a banning order (including the target shop)

    • Daisy was not motivated by revenge or seek to cause harm

    • This was not an offence in the ‘professional sense’

    • The victim was not particularly vulnerable (family shop operating on the same premises for thirty years)

    • The value of the good were not high (only 79.99)

  • Therefore, the lack of aggravating factors will mean that Daisy has a better chance of getting a more lenient sentence

Step 4:

Offence Mitigation

  • The value of the good stolen were of low value

Step 5:

“the Offender”

Offender Mitigation

P.265

  • She’s a young girl led astray by a previous boyfriend who made her addicted to heroin which, in turn, forced her to steal to feed her addiction

  • She is a reformed character and has a new boyfriend who has helped her get off heroin

  • She is young: the court should be still trying to help and rehabilitate her, not punish her

  • She was not under the influence of drugs or alcohol when she was arrested

  • She cooperated peacefully and was not violent or abusive when she spoke to the police

  • She remained voluntarily at the store until the police arrived and did not run away, which she would have been free to do

  • She had a troubled childhood: she hasn’t seen her mother or father (who is now in prison) since leaving home at 16 (9 in the case of her father)

  • She has a baby on the way and doesn’t have much money; a hefty fine or a prison sentence would only serve to punish he unborn child (especially because value is so low)

Step 6:

Give a Suggested Sentence

An attempt at lowering the sentence as far as possible must be made. Take into account the court factors outlined at step one above.

The court must take into account any guilty plea (s.144):

Plea Reduction
First opportunity 1/3 [maybe 1/5 if strong prosecution case]
After trial date set 1/4
On day of trial/during it 1/10

  • She doesn’t have any income and has a child on the way, therefore a fine would be unreasonable

  • Perhaps ask for a conditional discharge: this will mean that Daisy will not receive an immediate penalty for the offence committed, but if she is convicted of a further offence during the period of conditional discharge, she will be in breach of it

  • Perhaps ask for compensation to be awarded to David Jones to the effect of 79.99

  • If she is still struggling with drugs, then ask for a community order of rehabilitation (which will, in turn, help her family)

Therefore, the court will likely order a community order of rehabilitation because they would likely want to emphasise rehabilitation rather than punishment (s.142(1))

Plea in Mitigation e.g. II

Purpose of Sentencing

(s.142 CJA)

P.240

  1. Punishment (deterrence)

  2. Reduction of crime (reduction by deterrence)

  3. Rehabilitation of offenders

  4. Protection of the public

  5. Reparation

Step 1:

The Objective

You need to go to the “Magistrates Court Sentencing Guidelines” found in the back of the book or online. The guide for this offence is on p.562. Find the Max sentence and then work your way to the starting point. Procedure is in P.264 Disqualification for Drunk driving is on p.312.

Establish your Objective: to persuade the magistrates to impose a sentence which is less severe than the “starting point” sentence. Use of the Pre-Sentence Report to Guide you on likely sentence.

  • Default Sentence: the Magistrates Court Sentencing Guidelines suggest that for an offence of “excess alcohol drive” whose breath test produced a 91 micrograms of alcohol in 100 millilitres of breath the Court has an obligation to punish on two offences:

1. Driving Offence = Disqualify Christina between 23-28 months as she falls within the 90-119 band in the guidelines p.562. The court may reduce the disqualification only in “special reasons” (extremely short distance (less than 10 feet) spiked drinks, and emergency) But see below at sentencing

2. The Criminal Offence: associated to the traffic offence:

  • Maximum: Level 5 fine (5,000) and/or 6 months imprisonment

  • The starting point is: medium level community...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Criminal Litigation Notes.

More Criminal Litigation Samples