Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Becker

[2003] 1 BCLC 555

Case summary last updated at 21/01/2020 22:04 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Becker

D was alleged to be the shadow director of a company; he was sole shareholder, but his son was the director. Secretary of State claimed D was behind the decision to put company into voluntary liquidation. Only evidence that son was accustomed to act in line with D’s wishes was that both son and D had been present at a meeting in which it was decided to put company in liquidation. Held:
 
·        Fact that the company acted on one occasion in accordance with D’s directions or instructions is not enough to make him a shadow director
Ø  Must be accustomed to so act.
·        However to be ‘accustomed’ to act in line with D’s instructions, not necessary for company to have done so the majority of the time.
 
Facts
·        On facts, D was not shadow director as there was insufficient evidence to show company was accustomed to act in accordance with his wishes.

Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Becker crops up in following areas of law