Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Becker

[2003] 1 BCLC 555

Case summary last updated at 21/01/2020 22:04 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Becker

D was alleged to be the shadow director of a company; he was sole shareholder, but his son was the director. Secretary of State claimed D was behind the decision to put company into voluntary liquidation. Only evidence that son was accustomed to act in line with D’s wishes was that both son and D had been present at a meeting in which it was decided to put company in liquidation. Held:
 
·        Fact that the company acted on one occasion in accordance with D’s directions or instructions is not enough to make him a shadow director
Ø  Must be accustomed to so act.
·        However to be ‘accustomed’ to act in line with D’s instructions, not necessary for company to have done so the majority of the time.
 
Facts
·        On facts, D was not shadow director as there was insufficient evidence to show company was accustomed to act in accordance with his wishes.

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Company law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Company law Notes

Company law Notes >>