This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

BCL Law Notes Conflict of Laws Notes

Essay Points Seminars 1 2 Notes

Updated Essay Points Seminars 1 2 Notes

Conflict of Laws Notes

Conflict of Laws

Approximately 176 pages

These notes provide a comprehensive breakdown of what is needed, seminar by seminar, for the BCL Conflict of Laws course.

They include summaries of academic positions on key issues, case summaries, the relevance of a case to each area (eg. lis alibi pendens). They are organised in a simple, easy-digestible way without lacking any of the depth that is required to get to grips with this challenging module....

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Conflict of Laws Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

ESSAY POINTS RELATING TO SEMINARS 1-2

Criticism of Spiliiada

  1. Oceanic Sun Line/Voth Malidra (2 different cases) showed how in Australia, the same broad principle of forum non conveniens is applied, but differently. In Australia the immediate focus is not on the comparative appropriateness of the foreign court as against the local one, but on whether the Australian court is clearly inappropriate for the trial

  2. What this rule essentially does is determines whether the Australian court can hear the case. It reflects the view that if a court is given jurisdiction, it should convincing grounds before it declines to exercise it BUT

  3. Briggs

  • the leading Australian cases have been PI cases, where the prospect of making the injured C go limping off to a court far away, but preferred by the wrongdoer, is unattractive

  • Spiliada is better because it allows a judge in England to yield to the contention that the courts of another country would be better placed, and are available, to give the parties the adjudication they deserve. It reflects judicial comity in this sense.

  • Lord Goff described it as the ‘most civilized of legal principles’ (Airbus Industrie v Patel)

  1. Lord Goff

  • in Airbus he also called the doctrine of forum non convenines, ‘an imperfect weapon’ but still said it was flexible enough to get the best result which was conducive to practical justice

ABELA v BAADARANI

  1. Lord Sumption said that doctrine of forum non conveniens and interntional conventions have all made service out more regulated and a more acceptable practice

  2. He disagreed with the idea of ‘exorbitant jurisdiction’

  3. He said it’ll often be the case that there’s a jurisdiction clause anyway

GATEWAYS

  1. Briggs – he thinks these gateways add nothing to Spiliada. He suggests that had Spiliada been around before these gateways were thought up, then they wouldn’t have been conceived.

LIMITS ON SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION

  1. Jurisdiction?

  1. If a court has jurisdiction it means it has the power to hear and determine a case against D

  2. ...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Conflict of Laws Notes.