Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Consent Orders And The Effect Of Other Agreements Notes

Law Notes > Family Law Notes

This is an extract of our Consent Orders And The Effect Of Other Agreements document, which we sell as part of our Family Law Notes collection written by the top tier of Oxford students.

The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Family Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Consent Orders and the Effect of other Agreements Orders the Court can make

*
Income Orders o S.23 MCA 1973: Allows for a Peridoic Payment Order to be made
? These can be weekly, monthly or annual
? And can be secured against property or be unsecured o However, these have essentially been confined to the scrap heap
? If there are sufficient assets, a lump sum order will normally be made.

*
Property Orders o Three main types
? Lump sum orders

*
This requires a lump sum of money to be handed over by one spouse to the other o These can be made in instalments
? Transfer of Property order

*
The most common transfer of property order is an order that one party transfers a share of the matrimonial home to the other o The court can also order a transfer to be made to a party to be held on trust for the child(ren)
? Power to order sale

*
S.24A of MCA 1973 = power to order sale of property belonging to either both spouses or just one

*
The proceeds are then divided by a LSO.

*
Clean Break Orders o What are these?
? The making of such an order leads to finality - there can be no more applications for spousal support (this DOES NOT affect obligations under CSA 1991 for children though)
? S.25A(1) MCA 1973: There is a duty on the court to consider whether it would be appropriate [for the court] to exercise its powers

*
that the financial obligations of each party to the other will be terminated as soon as the grant of the decree o as the court considers just and reasonable o The advantages and disadvantages of clean break orders
? Benefits:

*
Parties free to pursue careers and lives without worrying about their actions leading to applications to vary maintenance payments

*
Parties may not feel emotionally free until financial orders end - but are encouraged to keep in contact if children, so bit of a paradox.

*
If the recipient intends to remarry, she may prefer a lump sum clean break, as this will leave her free to remarry w/o losing maintance

*
It avoids future stress of not knowing whether payments are going to be made,
? Disadvantage:

*
It's a break - court ties its hands hoping to avoid unforeseen circumstances

Consent Orders

*
What is a consent order?
o Negotiation between the parties
? Parties are being encouraged to resolve their financial disputes without having to go to court

*
Either through lawyer negotiation

*
Or through mediation o Why might we want to encourage this?
? Parties are encouraged to negotiate rather than fight it out

*
Reduces conflict and acrimony, which enables the parties to move forward o Modern family in family law, still recognise that even if status relationship ends, want people to still be bound to what they agree.

*
Also cheaper for parties as a whole for legal costs o And also mainly cheaper for the state - do not need lengthy court hearing or court order o Role of the court
? The Family Proceedings Rules 1999 mean that all the parties and their lawyers have to attend a Financial Dispute Resolution Hearing

*
This is conducted by a judge who would not preside over the subsequent trial if there was one

*
This gives the judge a bit of leeway to bang the parties' heads together and strongly encourage them to settle o While providing guidance on the likely results of trials.
? Under s.33A MCA - Court is supposed to scrutinise the agreement and compare it to the decision they would have reached via the s.25 exercise

*
Not a way to avoid regime - part of it o Davis et al: Research shows that the courts give very inadequate scrutiny
? Consent orders can differ quite significantly from what we expect might have been ordered if had gone to trial.

*
Harris v Manahan o Ward LJ:
? The court is no rubber stamp, nor is it a forensic ferret
? Herring: So while the court won't go through the order line by line, it can make sure that the agreement seems reasonable

*
And has the power to refuse to make it if it appears not to be

*
What status does the agreement have before it has been made by the court?
o Edgar v Edgar
? Held CoA

*
An agreement made that is then resiled on before the case reaches the court to make a consent order o Is not binding, but the court will take it into account when the case goes to a contested hearing

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Family Law Notes.

More Family Law Samples