Wider Parenthood Issues Notes

Wider Parenthood Issues

What is the basis for granting parenthood?

• Genetic Parentage

  • It could be claimed that the core notion of parenthood is genetic parenthood.

    • However, it is clear that there is not an exact correlation between genetic parentage and legal parenthood

      • The circumstances may mean that someone else does the job of the biological parent

  • The exceptions

    • But, there are only four times where the legal father will not be the genetic father:

      • 1. A husband is presumed to be the father of his wife’s child –

        • if the biological father does not object, the presumption is that H will be treated as the father

      • 2. In cases of AID treatment where the husband is the father under s.28(2) or the partner is the father under s.28(3) of HEFA 1990,

        • the child’s legal father will not be the genetic father

      • 3. An adopted father will be the father in the eyes of the law, even if he is not the genetic father

      • 4. Where the father has the benefit of a parental order, he will be the legal father but may not be the genetic father

    • However, all the above circumstances are quite rare

      • The vast majority of genetic parents are parents in law, although not all genetic fathers are awarded parental responsibility

        • However, it is odd that if genetics are the heart of legal parenthood, we do not require routine genetic paternity testing at birth

        • Instead we are happy to use presumptions of law – despite some claims that 30% of “fathers” are unaware they are not the genetic father of their wife’s children.

  • Why should genetics be considered the best?

    • Genetic Identity

      • Our genetic parents play a crucial role in our self identity – as shown by how it is often that adopted children later in life seek to trace their genetic parents

        • To recognise genetic parenthood acknowledges the importance of the child of the genetic link,

          • and recognises the importance many parents place on genetic links to their children.

    • Genetic Contribution

      • Genetic link is important b/c the child has been born out of the genetic contribution of the parents

        • As the child’s being results from the contribution of the two genetic parents, this contribution must be recognised.

    • Re G (Children)(Residence: Same Sex Partner)

      • Baroness Hale

        • For the parent, perhaps particularly for a father, the knowledge that this is “his” child can bring a very special sense of love for and commitment to that child

          • For the child, he reaps the benefit not only of that love and commitment,

            • but also of knowing his own origins and lineage, which is an important component in finding an individual sense of self as one grows up.

        • The knowledge of that genetic link may also be an important (although certainly not an essential) component in the love and commitment felt by the wider family,

          • perhaps especially grandparents, from which the child has so much to gain

• Intent

  • Should the law place less emphasis on genetic parentage and focus on intent?

    • Baker: A man is a father if he has struck a bargain with the gestational mother to take on that role

    • Clearly some circumstances where intent is crucial

      • In assisted reproduction, a man jointly receiving treatment with a woman is the father, even if no genetic link

      • A sperm donor can waive his parental status by going through the proper channels

      • Guardianship seems based on intention, but in a negative way in that, unless the guardian expressly disclaims the guardianship, they will be a guardian

      • Adoption is intent based. An adoption order is made only after a person volunteers to be an adoptive parent.

  • Problems

    • When a couple has intercourse, would be simplistic to say they intend to be parents

      • Father will have very limited role in whether M has abortion or not

      • Fact that M doesn’t abort doesn’t mean that M or F intend to be parents – may be religious/moral reasons

      • Also, if using contraceptives, then a presumption of intent flies in the face of the facts

    • A neighbour could not see that Y was pregnant and intend to be a parent – would not be recognised in law

    • Intent is uncertain – difficult to prove for routine and frequent things like childbirth

      • Might also hide certain policies behind it – e.g. not allow drug addict to have “intent” to be a parent b/c not capable of being an effective one

      • Focusing on intent more likely to burden the woman b/c easier to prove that man did not intend to be parent

  • Good points

    • Might allow same-sex to be easily considered parents – they intend to have child, therefore are parents.

    • Similarly, useful where competing claims of biology – one from the genetic mother and one from the gestational surrogate

      • Intent could play as the trump card – but for intent of commissioning parents, child not born.

• Earned parenthood?

  • Mother has earnt it through pregnancy and child birth

  • F must prove and earn it –

    • While good test for parental responsibility, genetic father could still be considered father despite having done nothing to earn it.

• Social parenthood and child welfare

  • We could get away from genetics and abstract notions of intent and actually deal with the realities of child psychology

    • For children, the person who provides their constant care and with whom they have an emotional relationship is who is most important

• All of the above

  • Bainham: The four need not be incompatible. By using a variety of understandings of “parent”, the law can recognise different aspects of parenthood

    • E.g. it is then possible for the law to acknowledge that both the genetic parent and the social parent have a role to play in a child’s life

Is there a right to know one’s genetic parentage?

• What could such a right entail?

  • It could involve one of three things:

    • 1. A right to know some non-identifying information about genetic parents

    • 2. A right to be told the names of genetic parents

    • 3. A right to meet one’s genetic parents

  • There rights could arise from an early age, or when the child reaches the age of majority

    • It should...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Family Law Notes.