Should Children Have The Same Rights As Adults Notes

Should Children have the same rights as adults?

Liberationist Theory

• The extreme liberationist approach

  • Children should have all the rights that adults have

    • This includes the right to vote, work, travel, use drugs and have sex

    • Holt: the law sees children as being wholly subservient and dependent... a mixture of expensive nuisance, slave and super pet”

  • Ferguson: May even go beyond will theory, b/c not actually about choice at all for some advocates – they will give rights regardless of ability to exercise them

    • Farson: What is good for children is beside the point

      • We will grant children rights for the same reason we grant rights to adults – not b/c we are sue that children will be better people

        • But more for ideological reasons – expanding freedom as a way of life is worthwhile in itself

        • Freedom is a difficult burden for adults as well as children.

• Why this is rubbish

  • Most children are unable to use the rights of adults

  • While this might be okay if only children could exercise them, danger of abuse by “litigation friends” who might assert on their behalf

    • E.g. Fortin: the right of the child to know genetic parentage

      • Is normally asserted by F as a pugnacious adult to assert their own claim – child themselves haven’t necessarily used or raised it

      • Courts give effect to possibly false assumption that biological links have distinct significance to children

The Will Theory

• An individual has a right as a “protected exercise of choice”

  • The moderate liberationist approach

    • Herring: Modern argument is harder to rebut – i.e. that shouldn’t discriminate on grounds of age to determine whether people have rights or not

      • Only on grounds of competence – so if not competent to drive, not allowed to drive – but not based on how old you are.

        • E.g. 15yo in E who clearly made a competent decision to refuse treatment would therefore have a right to refuse treatment and right to choose like an adult.

    • Problems

      • But it would cause bureaucratic difficulties –

        • can a barman assess every customer on whether they understand the potential effects of alcohol before they serve them?

      • Age is also predictable – enables people to plan their lives w/o fearing that they will be found incompetent.

Interest Theory

• MacCormick: Clearly children are often too young to exercise rights

  • However, this doesn’t mean that children don’t have sufficiently important interests which can generate duties and obligations on other

    • Just which can’t be exercised and asserted by the child themselves

      • E.g. child has a basic interest to be clothed and fed – this engenders duties on the parents to provide the child with adequate food and clothing

      • In the absence of parental intervention, then the duty falls on the State to intervene to protect the child’s interests.

  • Problems

    • Framing the law’s approach in this way does not make any difference to the child as what interests are to be recognised

      • requires an assessment of what children need which justifies imposing obligations on others to provide it

        • Could just simply ask “what is in a child’s best interests” and would get the same results

    • Also, only adults identify what interests are important, not the child themselves, so difficult to say how it is more child-centric than the welfare principle.

Eekelaar: Children’s rights and dynamic self determinism

• There are the kinds of interests relevant to children

  • Basic interests

    • These are the essential requirements of living – physical, emotional and intellectual interests

      • E.g. the interest in being provided with food and developing emotionally and intellectually

    • This duty lies on the state to provide where parents fail to do so.

  • Developmental interests

    • All children should have an equal opportunity to maximise the resources available to them during their childhood

      • So as to minimise the degree to which they enter adult life affected by avoidable prejudices during childhood.

      • Apart from education, probably rights which are hard to enforce.

  • Autonomy interest

    • This is the freedom for the child to make his or her own decisions about their life.

• The hierarchy of interests

  • Of the three interests, the autonomy interest would rank as subordinate to basic interests and developmental interests.

    • So bad decisions can be made by children, but not ones which infringe these other interests.

      • So the child’s decision to go to school would be overridden

      • But not the child’s decision to wear jeans.

    • Obviously there will be borderline cases, but you get them in every theory.

  • Herring: A pure autonomy approach his hard to apply to children

    • The way a child lives his or her childhood tends to affect choices in later life

      • So letting a child pursue their vision of the good life and not going to school from ages 10-20

      • Might then impact on the range of choices open to them when they’re 20, stopping them pursuing their goals.

        • So state might be justified in infringing autonomy

• Dynamic Self-Determinism

  • Promoting child’s welfare is served by encouraging this principle

    • The process is dynamic because it appreciates that the optimal course for a child cannot always be mapped out at the time of the decision

      • And may need to be revised as the child grows up

      • It involves self determinism because the child itself is given scope to influence the outcome

  • The aim is to bring a child to the threshold of adulthood with maximum opportunities to form and pursue life goals which reflect as closely as possible an autonomous choice

    • Thus, in making decisions about the child’s upbringing, care should be taken to avoid imposing inflexible outcomes at any early stage in a child’s development

      • Which unduly limit the child’s capacity to fashion his/her own identity, and the context in which it flourishes best.

• The problems

  • We can only look back as adults

    • Eekelaar: Adults need to look back on their childhood and we will probably say that we would not now have wanted every...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Family Law Notes.