Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Marriage Notes

Law Notes > Family Law Notes

This is an extract of our Marriage document, which we sell as part of our Family Law Notes collection written by the top tier of Oxford students.

The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Family Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Marriage Non-marriages, void marriages and voidable marriages The presumption of marriage

*
If a man and a woman live together, believe themselves to be married, and present themselves as married, the law presumes that they are legally married o The policy behind this is that the couple believes themselves should not suffer the disadvantages of not being so
? Without there being clear evidence
? In many cases, the presumption can be rebutted by showing that they do not appear on the register of marriage The differences between...

*
...a void marriage and non-marriage o A void marriage is one where, although there may have been some semblance of marriage
? There is in fact a fundamental flaw in the marriage which means that it is not recognised as valid in law
? If the marriage is classed as void, the court has the power to make financial orders, redistributing property between the couple

*
Such powers are not available if the marriage if a nonmarriage o A non-marriage is one where there is some vague element of marriage, but is so far from actual marriage, is not even defective
? Gandhi v Patel [2002]: Indian couple married in Indian restaurant - in something of a party.

*
Held o That was not close enough to a marriage - there was no solemn element, just a party. o Telling the difference between the two
? Gereis v Yagoub [1997]: H and W wanted to marry in the Russian Orthodox tradition. The priest warned them that would not be a civil marriage, so this would need to be done in a civil ceremony as well. They chose just to do the religious ceremony. Ten years passed but they then separated.

*
Aglionby J: o This is a void marriage, not a non-marriage
? The ceremony had the hallmarks of an ordinary Christian marriage
? The parties regarded themselves to be married
? The couple held themselves out as a married couple
? Hudson v Leigh [2009]: Here there was a religious ceremony in South Africa with people watching. However they changed the words to show it was not a marriage and even announced that it was not

*
Held: o Purported to be a marriage? = No o Look like a marriage? = Possibly o View of officials and couple = Not marriage o View of people = Not marriage
? Therefore pointed to non-marriage

*
...a void and a voidable marriage

o Validity
? A void marriage is one that in the eyes of the law has never existed
? A voidable marriage exists until it has been annulled by the courts

*
And if it is not annulled, then it will be regarded as valid o Legitimacy of children
? A child born to the parties in a void marriage would be technically illegitimate

*
Unless both parties reasonably believed at the time that they were married validly
? A child born into a voidable marriage is always regarded as legitimate o Who can assert the defect
? Any interested party can challenge a void marriage
? But only one of the spouses can assert a voidable marriage is void o Public interest vs. private interests
? Herring: This tells us that void marriages are based on some conception of public interest - e.g. under age of 16 - that court will intervene on

*
A voidable marriage = no public policy objection, but something wrong that is important enough that if parties care about it, can end it o So no trouble if no sex - not the law's business
? But could be if one part of couple cares about it The grounds on which a marriage is void

*

1. The couple are within prohibited degree of relationship o Consanguinity
? This is where the couple are related to each other in certain ways, such as:

*
Parent-child

*
Grandparent-Grandchild

*
Brother-Sister

*
Aunt-Nephew

*
Uncle-Niece
? This also includes half blood relationships, but not cousins. o Affinity restrictions
? Marrying a stepchild is generally not permitted unless:

*
(1) Both parties are over the age of 21

*
(2) the younger party has not been a child of the family in relation to the other while under the age of 18 o Thus, if the step-parent has ever acted in a parental role towards a step-child, the parties can never marry.
? Marrying a parent-in-law used to be only permitted in limited circumstances, but it is now permitted

*
The old requirements were that o (1) Both parties are aged over 21 o (2) Both their previous spouses have now died

*
This was challenged by B+ L v UK: The UK argued that restrictions were necessary so as to ensure no sexual rivalry between parents and children. W and In-Law argued that there had been some cases where you could marry in these circumstances - but only with a special act of Parliament

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Family Law Notes.

More Family Law Samples