Law Notes Intellectual Property Law Notes
IP law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. These notes cover all the LLB Intellectual Property law cases and so are perfect for anyone doing an LLB in the UK or a great supplement for those doing LLBs abroad, whether that be in Ireland, Hong Kong or Malaysia (University of London).
These were the best IP Law notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find after combing through dozens of LLB samples from outstanding law students with the highes...
The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Intellectual Property Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:
Requirements for a patentable invention
Novelty
For an invention to be patentable it must be new
PA s1(1)(a)
EPC 2000 Art 52(1)
An invention is not new if it does not form part of the “state of the art” (PA s2(1), EPC Art 54(1))
State of the art – broadly framed – includes all matter that is available anywhere in the world before the priority date of the invention
Where an invention is disclosed or “anticipated” by the state of the art, a patent will not be granted, or, if it has been granted, the parent is liable to be revoked
Novelty v inventive step
Novelty requires that the invention be “qualitatively different” from what has previously been disclosed – that the technical information disclosed by the patent is not already available to the public
Novelty is diff to the requirement that the invention must have involved an “inventive step” – this is a qualitative examination of whether the contribution is creative enough to warrant a monopoly
Why do we have novelty?
Novelty ensures that patents are not used to stop people from doing what they had already done before the patent was granted
This “right to work” argument has been modified as a result of how novelty is determined
Overall rationale for the grant of patents is supported by novelty – that the public is willing to pay the costs of patenting if and only if they are able to get access to information that would not otherwise have been available to them
Contract analogy – novelty provides the consideration necessary to warrant the patent being granted in the first place
Britain’s entry into the EPC introduced some changes in the way the novelty requirement is applied in the UK
The 1977 Act and EPC operate on the principle of “objective novelty” so as to avoid subjective judgments that lead to uncertainty
Both British and European law have adopted the principle of “absolute novelty” – meaning that the novelty of an invention is judged against all the information which is available at the priority date of the invention, irrespective of where the info was released or the form that it was released in
Criticised – allowing obscure materials to anticipate – harsh results
BUT absolute novelty – provides a “bright line” test thus “avoiding subjectivity and most questions of degree” - Milliken Denmark AS [1996]
The task of determining whether an invention is novel
What is the invention?
What information is disclosed by the prior art?
In light of the above, is the invention novel/ is the invention part of the state of the art?
What is an invention?
This Q has received little attention
What information is disclosed by the prior art?
What material forms part of the state of the art?
State of the art defined in broad and inclusive terms to include all matter (products, process, information) which, at the priority date of the application, has been made available to the public by written or oral description, by use or in any other way – PA s2(2), EPC Art 54(2)
No geographical limits on where the state of the art must be disclosed – info that is available anywhere in the world
No restrictions on the mode of disclosure – info part of the state of the art irrespective of how it is made available to the public
No requirements on how widely the info must be published – a single copy of a document is sufficient
Material is part of the state of the art if it is capable of being accessed – no need to demonstrate a person actually had access to the info, only that if they wanted to, they could have
The date at which novelty is assessed = the priority date of the invention – state of the art only includes info made available before this date
In contrast with other patent regimes, applicants for UK and European patents are not provided with a “grace period” – a period prior to filing where they are able to practice their inventions
Consequently, patents are frequently anticipated and rendered invalid for want of novelty as a result of the applicant’s own acts and disclosures
Priority date is therefore important because it is the date from when inventors are able to exploit their inventions without jeopardising potential patents
NOTE - US used to require novelty at the date of invention not the date of application
Leahy-Smith America Invents Act 2011 adopted the date of application
BUT US still have a “grace period” – during which a scientist can disclose his invention without depriving a later patent application of novelty
America Invents Act 2011 – 102(2)
2) EXCEPTIONS.—‘(1) DISCLOSURES MADE 1 YEAR OR LESS BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE FILING DATE OF THE CLAIMED INVENTION.—A disclosure made 1 year or less before the effective filing date of a claimed invention shall not be prior art to the claimed invention under subsection (a)(1) if—
(A) the disclosure was made by the inventor or joint inventor or by another who obtained the subject matter disclosed directly or indirectly from the inventor or a joint inventor
SO the invention will not enter into the state of the art by virtue of your own disclosure
Benefits of this – the fact that scientists don’t have to keep their inventions secret allows for more scientific discussion
The Manchester Manifesto: Who owns science? – “Restrictions on access to information at any stage of the innovative process obstruct the flow of scientific information and thereby impede scientific progress”
Material obtained unlawfully or disclosed into the public as a breach of confidence is not taken into account
Info is also excluded from the state of the art where the disclosure was sue to the inventor displaying the invention at an “international exhibition”
BUT these exclusions only apply to disclosures that are made in the 6-month period immediately preceding the date of filing
What info is disclosed by the prior art?
The info disclosed by the prior art is restricted to the info that a person skilled in the art is able to derive form the prior art in Q
Documents
Documents are interpreted...
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Intellectual Property Law Notes.
IP law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. These notes cover all the LLB Intellectual Property law cases and so are perfect for anyone doing an LLB in the UK or a great supplement for those doing LLBs abroad, whether that be in Ireland, Hong Kong or Malaysia (University of London).
These were the best IP Law notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find after combing through dozens of LLB samples from outstanding law students with the highes...
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get Started