This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

LPC Law Notes Commercial and IP Notes

Exclusion Clauses Notes

Updated Exclusion Clauses Notes

Commercial and IP Notes

Commercial and IP

Approximately 100 pages

A collection of the best LPC Commercial and IP notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find after combing through twenty-nine LPC samples from outstanding students with the highest results in England and carefully evaluating each on accuracy, formatting, logical structure, spelling/grammar, conciseness and "wow-factor".

In short these are what we believe to be the strongest set of CLIP notes available in the UK this year. This collection of notes is fully updated fo...

Available here

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Commercial and IP Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Commercial Law

Exclusion Clauses

Definition:

  • A clause which attempts to limit, exclude, define liability [see S.13 UCTA 1977]

It includes:

  • Exclusion / restriction of liability

  • S.13(1)(a) making liability or its enforcement subject to restrictive or onerous conditions [e.g. you can only complain within 10 days of delivery]

  • S.13(1)(b) excluding or restricting any right to remedy in respect of liability or subjecting a person to any prejudice in consequence of his pursuing any such remedy [e.g. if you sue us we will terminate out agreement with you]

How to rely on a EC = the three hurdles

Incorporation Signature

  • Customer who signs is bound whether or not he reads the terms
Reasonable Notice

  • Incorporate through reference to terms / conditions in another contractual document [e.g. confirmation slip; sales invoice; NOT a receipt]

  • Court will want to see that reasonable steps were taken to incorporate

  • Timing: Olley v Malborough Court = must be referred to before contract is made.

  • Smith v South Wales Switchgear = if Party B have not received notice that a particular version of the terms are to be incorporated, it is implied that the most recent version of terms are the ones incorporated.

  • Onerous terms: Interfoto Picture Library v Stilleto = there should be further steps taken to highlight the term [e.g. bold & large print; Placing a clear terms at the beginning of the document advising the other party that attention is particularly drawn to certain conditions]
Previous course of dealing

  • Party A and Party B have contracted on a regular basis

  • Terms always incorporated and no objections have been raised to the terms
Trade custom

  • Party A and Party B are involved in the same trade

  • They are both aware that certain conditions are customarily implied
Construction

  • Does the clause cover the breach?

  • The clause must:

  1. Cover the breach which actually occurs; and

  2. Exclude the seller’s liability for that breach

  • Contra proferentem [construed against the person trying to rely on it]

  • Clear and unambiguous wording needed
Statutory supervision / control

  1. UCTA 1997

  2. UTCC Regulation 1999

  3. Misrepresentation Act 1967

Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977:

S.2

All contracts - Negligence:

  • S.2(1): No contract can exclude liability for death or PI which is a result of negligence

  • S.2(2): Other damage / loss = EC must be reasonable
S.3

B2C contracts or where one party has incorporated standard terms

  • EC must be reasonable
S.6

  • S.6(1): All contracts: S.12 SGS cannot be excluded [title]

  • S.6(2): B2C Contracts: S.13,14,15 SGA cannot be excluded [description, quality, sample]

  • S.6(3): B2B contracts: S.13,14,15 SGA will be excluded to the extent that they satisfy the requirement of reasonableness.

Consider the test for a consumer:

  • S.12 UCTA “Dealing as a consumer”

  • Is the person doing something integral to his trade / part of his day to day activities.
S.11

Reasonableness:

  • Refers to schedule 2 – this is not an exhaustive list [just gives guidelines]

  • B2C contracts – courts more likely to view contract with common sense [i.e. was it fair]

  • B2B contracts – schedule 2 factors can be considered and given more weight.

  • Burden of proof: on party seeking to rely on the EC

  • Time of assessment is the time at which the contract was concluded [“in contemplation of the parties when the contract wad made – S.11]

  • AEG v Logic Resource: even if the exemption clause is incorporated, if Party B did not have notice of it – the court may find that the cuase is unreasonable.
S.11

Misrepresentation Act 1967:

  • S.3 MISREP Act says that for S.2(1) or innocent Misrep – the clause is subject to the reasonableness test in S.11(1) UCTA.

  • Applies to ANY contract [B2B or B2C] – so can apply to fully negotiated contracts between businesses.

  • Overbrook Estates v Glencombe 1974: authority for the argument that a clause excluding the authority of agents to make representations was not caught...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Commercial and IP Notes.

More Commercial And Ip Samples