| What is an earn-out? These are most often used where S continues to manage the company post-acquisition. | For example... B values the company at 10m based on its past performance. S values the company at 15m based on projections of the company's future profit. If they can't agree on the fixed value of the company, they could agree that B pays the initial 10m, and then the remaining 5m if S's valuation proves true within a certain amount of years. |
| Is an earn-out applicable on the facts? Is there a concern about the level of profit in the target company? if so, an earn-out will address this concern. Is there a dispute about the potential level of profit/valuation of the target company? Are there any suggestions that the profit will keep climbing at a particular rate? Are sellers remaining involved in the company? company selling? very unlikely to continue to be involved (unlike, for example, individuals selling shares in a family business) wants to do other projects/things? Are there other concerns which an earn-out won't address? |
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
B pays exactly what the company is worth and avoids overpaying if the company doesn't live up to expectations | Conflict between short-term growth (which benefits S who will be looking to maximise profit) and long-term growth (which benefits B). |
Motivates S/manager of Business to maximise the profit of the company, particularly if that person is likely to stay on and continue to play some role in running Business. | Possibility that B could acquire the target and sell it to a third party. If B did that, then the profit won't meet S's projections and will affect how much consideration they will receive. Restrictions can be put in place to prevent this - Sellers remain involved and spot if B does something against spirit of the agreement. |
Completion Accounts |
| What are completion accounts? When negotiating, parties may have based their valuation on dated information (such as the last audited accounts). B will want confirmation that the figures have not altered significantly since the date of original accounts. The completion accounts will confirm the valuation of the target and make provisions for any necessary adjustments to price on completion date to reflect the actual net earnings and/or assets of the company. | Are completion accounts applicable on the facts? Stock/Assets Is there a concern/disagreement about the method of valuation of an asset (e.g. stock valuations, depreciation, bad/doubtful debts)? Is the valuation based on management accounts (whose purpose is not the valuation of the company for sale as a going concern) or out-of-date audited annual accounts? If so, then completion accounts will give an accurate and up-to-date valuation of the assets on completion date, determine the method of valuation, and impose time limits (e.g. end of season stock will be depreciated more than new season stock for a retailer) Profit levels Is there a concern about the level of profit in the target company? (e.g. very high for the most recent period but based on out of date accounts) Completion accounts will be able to determine the exact level of profit from the last audited accounts (date?) to the completion date (date?) Can also negotiate accounting policies for bad debts, doubtful debts, depreciation, etc. Would litigation be problematic (e.g. foreign jurisdiction?) - if so, then completion accounts will be easier than pursuing a warranty claim that the out-of-date accounts are true, accurate and not misleading. |
| Advantages |
Accuracy | Up-to-date audited accounts B doesn't have up-to-date assessment of the company before completion Audited accounts are not made up to value the company and may be out of date Management accounts may be up-to-date, but their purpose is to aid the running of business and not to value the company for sale as a going concern. |
Cash flow advantage for B |
Agreed accounting policies in advance On P&L account, the above are expenses and will increase profit by keeping them low. Will also affect assets and the valuation of the company (i.e. higher 'debtors' = higher net assets). | Better than relying on warranties Certainty - B paying the right price at Start Easier to compile completion accounts and amend the purchase price by an additional payment/refund Time & expense - Warranty claims will be time-consuming and expensive. S may have no money - Even if B wins litigation for breach of warranty, S may have 0 and they will therefore get no money. Limitations - Warranty claims may be limited and B may not therefore get full recompense. Better for both parties - pay the right price and no litigation/claims should business turn out to be less valuable than promised. |
Quicker to get negotiations moving (on the whole) Where parties unlikely to agree on fixed price. Emphasis on negotiations may move to other terms, e.g. warranties |
S may get more consideration in the long run |
| Disadvantages |
Delay in receiving consideration S may not receive all of its consideration at once (e.g. if there is a later balancing payment). But, S may get more in the long run. | Time and expense of negotiations/drawing them up May be time consuming disputes in relation to heavily negotiated terms, such as the accounting policies. May also be disagreements i n their preparation and finalisation. |
B could pay more/demand refund if less | Deal done, but negotiation focuses on the other terms |