Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Walby Theorising Patriarchy Notes

PPE Notes > Sociological Theory Notes

This is an extract of our Walby Theorising Patriarchy document, which we sell as part of our Sociological Theory Notes collection written by the top tier of University Of Oxford students.

The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Sociological Theory Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Sylvia Walby - Theorising Patriarchy (1989) Introduction
* Patriarchy and capitalism are analytically independent
* Patriarchy can be modelled in terms of several partially interdependent structures Definition
* Definitions of patriarchy differ
* it has been used to describe relations in which men dominate both women and younger generations of men
# this is a mistake because it implies a theory of gender inequality in which men's domination of other men is central in men's domination of women
* Patriarchy can preliminarily be defined as 'a system of social structures, and practices in which men dominate, oppress and exploit women'
* 'structures' allows for the fact that not all men are in dominate positions, and likewise not all women are dominated
* Patriarchy exists primarily as a set of social relations, then as a set of structures, then as a set of practices Dual Systems Analysis
* Patriarchy pre-dates and post-dates capitalism, and hence cannot be derived from it (likewise racism)
* Hence we need a dual or triple systems analysis, in terms of capitalism, patriarchy and racism
* Are the different parts seen as fused into one system of capitalist racist patriarchy, or as analytically distinct categories?
* distinct
# Hartmann's analysis, though ostensibly retaining distinctness, underestimates the tension between capitalism and patriarchy
* The conflicts of patriarchal and capitalist interests do not have an inevitable result, but are based on local factors in patriarchal and capitalist relations Ahistoricism, Universalism and Diversity
* Can patriarchy deal with different forms of gender inequality at different times and places?
* e.g. experiences of black women are very different to those of white women - for black women the family is not a theatre of domination, but a relief from racist domination
* 'We need a concept of patriarchy which is flexible enough to capture the variation in women's experience and inequality between women.'
* Is a concept of patriarchy essentialist in defining 'woman' etc? Does this view the place of women as static?
* often feminist writing does take one factor as the critical base of patriarchy, creating a universalist and ahistoric theory
# but even where feminist theory is like this, its empirical findings show variation in patriarchal relations
* clearly there is a diversity of key structures and practices with causal primacy in gender relations
# the family
# sexuality

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Sociological Theory Notes.