Politics, Philosophy and Economics Notes > University Of Oxford Politics, Philosophy and Economics Notes > Sociological Theory Notes

Walby Theorising Patriarchy Notes

This is a sample of our (approximately) 3 page long Walby Theorising Patriarchy notes, which we sell as part of the Sociological Theory Notes collection, a First package written at University Of Oxford in 2014 that contains (approximately) 77 pages of notes across 21 different documents.

Learn more about our Sociological Theory Notes

The original file is a 'Word (Docx)' whilst this sample is a 'PDF' representation of said file. This means that the formatting here may have errors. The original document you'll receive on purchase should have more polished formatting.

Walby Theorising Patriarchy Revision

The following is a plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Sociological Theory Notes. This text version has had its formatting removed so pay attention to its contents alone rather than its presentation. The version you download will have its original formatting intact and so will be much prettier to look at.

Sylvia Walby - Theorising Patriarchy (1989) Introduction
● Patriarchy and capitalism are analytically independent
● Patriarchy can be modelled in terms of several partially interdependent structures Definition
● Definitions of patriarchy differ
○ it has been used to describe relations in which men dominate both women and younger generations of men
■ this is a mistake because it implies a theory of gender inequality in which men's domination of other men is central in men's domination of women
● Patriarchy can preliminarily be defined as 'a system of social structures, and practices in which men dominate, oppress and exploit women'
○ 'structures' allows for the fact that not all men are in dominate positions, and likewise not all women are dominated
● Patriarchy exists primarily as a set of social relations, then as a set of structures, then as a set of practices Dual Systems Analysis
● Patriarchy pre-dates and post-dates capitalism, and hence cannot be derived from it (likewise racism)
● Hence we need a dual or triple systems analysis, in terms of capitalism, patriarchy and racism
● Are the different parts seen as fused into one system of capitalist racist patriarchy, or as analytically distinct categories?
○ distinct
■ Hartmann's analysis, though ostensibly retaining distinctness, underestimates the tension between capitalism and patriarchy
● The conflicts of patriarchal and capitalist interests do not have an inevitable result, but are based on local factors in patriarchal and capitalist relations Ahistoricism, Universalism and Diversity
● Can patriarchy deal with different forms of gender inequality at different times and places?
○ e.g. experiences of black women are very different to those of white women - for black women the family is not a theatre of domination, but a relief from racist domination
○ 'We need a concept of patriarchy which is flexible enough to capture the variation in women's experience and inequality between women.'
● Is a concept of patriarchy essentialist in defining 'woman' etc? Does this view the place of women as static?
○ often feminist writing does take one factor as the critical base of patriarchy, creating a universalist and ahistoric theory
■ but even where feminist theory is like this, its empirical findings show variation in patriarchal relations
○ clearly there is a diversity of key structures and practices with causal primacy in gender relations
■ the family
■ sexuality

****************************End Of Sample*****************************

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Sociological Theory Notes.