This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

#12635 - Weber Class Status Party - Sociological Theory

Notice: PDF Preview
The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Sociological Theory Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting.
See Original

Max Weber - Class, Status, Party

2. Determination of Class-Situation by Market-Situation

  • Classes are not communities - they represent possible and frequent bases for communal action

  • A class situation is:

    • the chance for a supply of goods, external living conditions and life experiences where this chance is determined by power to dispose of goods or skills for the sake of income.

      • essentially, where goods and living conditions depend on market power and action

  • A class is:

    • a group of people with a specific causal component of their life chances in common, where this component is represented:

      • in economic interests in possession of goods and income opportunities

      • under the conditions of the commodity/labour markets

  • Disposition over material property in an exchange market creates life chances

    • this advantages owners over non-owners, owing to the law of marginal utility

    • market exchange advantages those who do not have to sell over those who do, and the latter group are forced to sell their services cheaply as a result

    • hence property and lack of property are ‘the basic categories of all class situations’

  • Within the two categories of ‘property’ and ‘lack of property’, classes are differentiated according to the kind of property available, and the kind of services available

  • The concept of class presupposes the game of chance in the market, and hence the existence of a market

    • possession is not a category upon which classes are formed, whereas property is

    • the fate of slaves is not determined by market activity, and hence slaves are not a class, but a status group

3. Communal Action Flowing from Class Interest

  • So, classes are created by economic interest, and even at at only by those interests tied up in the market

    • but these interests are somewhat ambiguous, and do not necessarily lead to certain types of action

    • direction of interests may vary according to whether communal action has followed from the common economic interest e.g. through a trade union

    • the degree to which mass (and disparate?) actions are translated into communal and societal action will depend upon cultural and intellectual conditions

  • In order for class action to occur, classes must not just see the contrast in life chances at the market exchange, but recognise it as the result of:

    • the given distribution of property

      • basis of class action in antiquity, middle ages, feudalism etc (when food and agriculture were exploited for profit)

    • or the structure of the concrete economic order

      • as in the case of the modern proletariat

4. Types of ‘Class Struggle’

  • Hence a class may form the basis for class action, but will not necessarily do so

  • Class is not the same as community

    • denigratory comments about the idea that an individual can be in error as to his interest, but a class is infallible

  • The communal action from which classes originate is action between members of different classes, in the market exchange, namely

    • the labour market

    • the commodities market

    • the capitalistic enterprise (cf. Marxist views on class and exploitation)

      • this presupposes a legal order to protect property rights

    • historically, class action began through essential items in the commodities market, and as time has gone, has moved to wage disputes in the labour market

  • Class antagonisms are usually displayed between those that participate on the markets, not necessarily those with the most opposing interests

    • for example, between workers and manufacturers/business executives (cf. Olin Wright on managerial class position) rather than between workers and share-holders/bankers

    • this has led to ‘patriarchal socialism’ and alliances between the proletariat and other status groups (e.g. nobility??) against the bourgeoisie

5. Status Honour

  • In contrast to classes, status groups are normally communities

    • status refers to the components of a person’s fate that rest on social estimation of honour

    • property may or may not be regarded as a status qualification

      • often status ‘stands in sharp opposition to the pretensions of sheer property’

        • e.g. equality status of American ‘gentlemen’ - outside of business, even the richest man must treat the poorest (within the club) without condescension

6. Guarantees of Status Stratification

  • You can expect a certain style of life from members of the same status circle

    • this consists in ‘agreed-upon communal action’

  • ‘Submission to fashion’ indicates that a man pretends to qualify as a gentleman, and this implies that he will be treated as one

7. ‘Ethnic’ Segregation and ‘Caste’

  • Status groups can evolve into closed castes, where distinctions of status are guaranteed by rituals as well as conventions and laws

    • this usually occurs where ethnic differences lead to status distinctions

  • But status groups do usually span ethnic groups - they are often formed on the basis of ‘political membership or class situation’

8. Status Privileges

  • Status stratification leads to monopolization of ideal and material goods and opportunities

    • e.g. wearing costumes, eating special dishes, bearing arms, intermarriage, possession of serfs/bondsmen, special trades

  • Privileges status groups often disqualify those that perform manual labour; other groups may disqualify those that pursue entrepreneurial activity

9. Economic Conditions and Effects of Status Stratification

  • Status stratification opposes the distribution of power that would be regulated through the market

    • there is a distinction between the two because those without lots of property have an interest in stratification being based on something other than property acquisition

  • Status stratification hinders the free market for those goods which status groups withhold from exchange

  • To simplify:

    • classes are stratified according to their relations to production and acquisition

    • status groups are stratified according to the principles of their consumption of goods, as represented by certain styles of life

  • Stratification occurs by status rather than by class where acquisition and distribution of goods are relatively stable historically

    • economic transformation threatens stratification by status because it pushes class to the fore

Bureaucracy

  • Essentially, insofar as there are commodity markets (and most clearly where there are advanced money markets) there will exist a bureaucratic stratum

    • this stratum will practice in...

Unlock the full document,
purchase it now!
Sociological Theory