This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

#10620 - Functional Deficits Underlying Amnesia. Lec 2docx - Neuropsychology of Memory

Notice: PDF Preview
The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Neuropsychology of Memory Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting.
See Original

Functional Deficits Underlying Amnesia

Historical attempts to understand amnesia

  • Lashley (1929)

  • Wanted to search for the “engram” of memory physical representation of memory in the brain / single biological locus of memory

  • He researched this by looking at the measurement of behaviour before + after specific, carefully quantified , induced brain damage in rats

  • He trained rats to perform specific tasks – for food rewards -then lesioned specific areas of the rats cortex – either before or after training

  • Cortical lesions had specific effects on the acquisition + retention of knowledge - but the location of the rats cortical damage had no effect on the rats performance on the maze

  • This led Lashley to conclude that memories are not localised - rather they are widely distributed across cortex

  • Developed a theory of ‘Mass Action’ rate, efficacy + accuracy of learning depends upon the amount of cortex available - deterioration of performance on the task is determined by the amount of tissue removed rather than its location

  • Also developed idea of ‘Equipotentiality’ one part of the cortex can take over the function of another part within a functional area of the brain - any tissue within that area can perform the function - therefore to destroy a function – all tissue in that area must be destroyed.

  • Penfield (1954)

  • While conducting surgery to remove specific types of temporal loci which were causing epilepsy – noticed that stimulation of the temporal lobe induced vivid memory representations in patients

Can Penfield’s results be otherwise explained?

  • Only small minority of patients (7%) stimulated in the temporal lobe gave memory like responses

  • These memories had a dream like quality to them – inaccessible, fantasy like – are they really memories?

  • Some memories appeared to be false

  • Memory experience was not tied to the location of stimuli - sometimes got memories when stimulated different locations

  • The effects may have been a result of electrical discharges spreading to other brain sites

Case R.B. (Zola-Morgan, Squire & Amaral, 1986)

  • Early evidence suggested memory impairment could be localised to the medial temporal lobe (Glees & Griffith, 1952)

  • Formal testing of H.M + 9 other patients - Scoville & Milner (1957) – led to the view that damage to the hippocampus was responsible for the amnesia

  • Memory impairment was observed whenever the hippocampus + hippocampal gyrus were damaged bilaterally

  • Patient whose resection included the amygdala + uncus - + sparing the hippocampus was not amnesic

  • The severity of deficits correlated with the extent of hippocampal damage – directly proportional (Milner, 1972)

  • Case R.B.

  • Suffered an ischematic episode during heart surgery – severe temporary loss of BP – blood oxygen doesn’t reach certain areas of the brain

  • Given battery of neuropsychological tests (paired associate, word pairs, WMS, diagram recall, Rey-Osterreith) severe impairment on tests of verbal + non-verbal memory function => severe AA

  • Given RA tests – public events, famous faces, TV programmes, autobiographical recall had little or no loss of memory from before damage

  • No signs of sig cognitive impairment bar his memory

  • Post mortem analysis extensive + fairly selective damage to the CA1 region of the hippocampus – no cell loss was detectable in any other field of the hippocampal formation other than CA1

  • Also were unilateral lesions to basal ganglia + somatosensory cortex (not associated with memory before) – must consider the possibility that impairment came from combo of this and CA1.

  • Memory impairment following limited damage is stable + long lasting – persisted for more than 4yrs after injury

  • Consistent with findings that experimentally induced ischemia in rats damages the CA1 region of the hippocampus + results in long-lasting deficits in new learning ability (Davis et al., 1986)

  • Findings support the idea that declarative memory is impairment + that the hippocampus is an essential component of this damaged neural system – procedural memory is independent of this system.

  • Circumscribed bilateral lesion to the CA1 field of the hippocampus is sufficient to induce amnesia

Many types of amnesia:

  • Encephalitis – clive wearing

  • Surgical removals – H.M

  • Anoxia (depleted O2 levels) – R.B.

  • Alcohol abuse (thiamine deficiency) Korsakoff syndrome – P.Z.

  • Accidents e.g. fencing iron – N.A.

  • Degenerative disorders

  • Strokes

Squire (1982) – Two different types of amnesia

  • Amnesic patients damage falls roughly into 2 areas

  1. Diencephalic region (thalamus) – N.A., Korsakovs, P.Z

  2. Medial temporal region – e.g. HM, RB, Clive Wearing.

  • Suggested that recent studies of forgetting provide strong evidence that there are two forms of amnesia that are fundamentally different – diencephalic + bitemporal

  • Idea first advanced by Lhermitte & Signoret (1972)

  • Patients viewed 120 coloured slides

  • Retention assessed by yes/no recognition procedure at 3 diff intervals after learning (1m,1day,7days) -40new slides + 40 original slides presented at each interval (amnesics given longer to look @ slides)

  • Findings support the idea that diencephalic amnesia (Korsakoff + N.A) is characterised by a normal rate of forgetting

  • Bitemporal amnesia (H.M + ECT patients) characterised by rapid forgetting

What are the cognitive processes disrupted in amnesia?

Encoding failure to encode info in a suitable way for long term retention

Storage failure to retain info over a delay

Retrieval failure to access existing memory

ENCODING

  • Cermack (1979) – used Craick &Lockhart (1972) levels of processing theory

  • Hyp = amnesics fail to spontaneously encode info deeply

  • Shown cartoons (funny or neutral) – given 3 tasks...

Unlock the full document,
purchase it now!
Neuropsychology of Memory