Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Functional Deficits Underlying Amnesia. Lec 2docx Notes

Psychology Notes > Neuropsychology of Memory Notes

This is an extract of our Functional Deficits Underlying Amnesia. Lec 2docx document, which we sell as part of our Neuropsychology of Memory Notes collection written by the top tier of Durham University students.

The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Neuropsychology of Memory Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Functional Deficits Underlying Amnesia Historical attempts to understand amnesiaLashley (1929)
- Wanted to search for the "engram" of memory ? physical representation of memory in the brain / single biological locus of memory
- He researched this by looking at the measurement of behaviour before
+ after specific, carefully quantified , induced brain damage in rats
- He trained rats to perform specific tasks - for food rewards -then lesioned specific areas of the rats cortex - either before or after training
- Cortical lesions had specific effects on the acquisition + retention of knowledge - but the location of the rats cortical damage had no effect on the rats performance on the maze
- This led Lashley to conclude that memories are not localised - rather they are widely distributed across cortex
- Developed a theory of 'Mass Action' ? rate, efficacy + accuracy of learning depends upon the amount of cortex available - deterioration of performance on the task is determined by the amount of tissue removed rather than its location
- Also developed idea of 'Equipotentiality' ? one part of the cortex can take over the function of another part within a functional area of the brain - any tissue within that area can perform the function - therefore to destroy a function - all tissue in that area must be destroyed.Penfield (1954)
- While conducting surgery to remove specific types of temporal loci which were causing epilepsy - noticed that stimulation of the temporal lobe induced vivid memory representations in patients

Can Penfield's results be otherwise explained?Only small minority of patients (7%) stimulated in the temporal lobe gave memory like responses These memories had a dream like quality to them - inaccessible, fantasy like - are they really memories?
Some memories appeared to be false Memory experience was not tied to the location of stimuli - sometimes got memories when stimulated different locations
? The effects may have been a result of electrical discharges spreading to other brain sites

Case R.B. (Zola-Morgan, Squire & Amaral, 1986)?

Early evidence suggested memory impairment could be localised to the medial temporal lobe (Glees & Griffith, 1952) Formal testing of H.M + 9 other patients - Scoville & Milner (1957) - led to the view that damage to the hippocampus was responsible for the amnesia

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Neuropsychology of Memory Notes.