This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

Psychology Notes Neuropsychology of Memory Notes

Visual Memory Deficit Amnesia Lec 5 Notes

Updated Visual Memory Deficit Amnesia Lec 5 Notes

Neuropsychology of Memory Notes

Neuropsychology of Memory

Approximately 63 pages

These notes aim to provide an understanding of cognitive neuropsychological models of high level behaviour such as remembering, recognising, short and long term memory and the role of the brain in this behaviour.

These notes are informative, precise, easy to follow and are drawn from a wide range of sources utilising additional course reading and independent reading. ...

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Neuropsychology of Memory Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Visual Memory Deficit Amnesia

  • Greenberg & Rubin (2003) – burger example

  • Smell of burgers leads to activation in olfactory cortex

  • This via MTL mediation would activate a pattern of firing in visual cortex that represents the memory of a friend once cooking them

  • This activity in visual cortex – may stimulate new activity in audiotry cortex - represents the sound of a conversation once had with that friend

  • This is the CASCADE of activation

  • This activity would also stimulate regions dedicated to language, narrative + emotion - impart the emotional tone to the memory

  • The recall of an autobiographical memory occurs over one measurable time period - but not in one brain location => it is located in time – but distributed in space.

  • Rubin & Greenwood (1998) When an autobiographical memory is recalled info in widely separated areas of cortex are excited :

  • E.g. a familiar sound may lead to activation in auditory cortex – which either directly or via the hippocampal mediation might activate a pattern of firing in visual cortex – stimulating a visual image

  • This activity in visual cortex may in turn stimulate new activity in visual, auditory + other cortices - stimulating visual images, sounds, smells - while feed-backing to the original pattern of firing in auditory cortex cascade of activation – produces a patterns of firing similar to that present during the original experience

Most memories have strong visual component:

  • Crawley & Eacott (2006)

  • Asked to recollect + describe a memory from childhood investigated the extent to which the memory had visual, auditory, spatial etc aspects

  • Visual detail is the largest + most regularly reported detail - this is higher than any other sensory component

  • Suggestive that memories rely heavily on visual representations

  • Rubin (2006)

  • Participants are given a cue word - asked to retrieve and episodic memory associated with that word whislt undergoing fMRI

  • Asked to hit a button once memory brought to mind

  • Large activation of the hippocampus at memory retrieval, PFC activated when making a decision on the memory to think of

  • Visual cortex was v. active - retrieval of the memory activated the visual cortex

  • Further suggests there is a large amount of visual info in memory representations

What happens to EM if visual association cortex is damaged?

  • New experiences will have a degraded visual component and so anterograde memories will be formed with this degraded input. Relative absence of visual component will affect but may not be devastating to memory integrity.

  • Pre-existing memories (i.e. retrograde) were formed of events that included an intact visual component. Stored visual component will be degraded/lost.

  • For retrograde memories the lack of visual component may also prevent the cascade of associations to other modality components, affecting retrieval of them too. This will effect all retrograde memories equally, so there will be no temporal gradient to retrograde amnesia.

  • Hypothesis: the loss of visual association cortex will result in a form of amnesia with the above characteristics. Called Visual Memory Deficit Amnesia (VMDA)

Differences between MTL amnesia

Differences between VMDA + cortical/retinal blindness

  1. New exp will not have a visual component + so AA will be formed without it

  • Visual association cortex still exists - but will receive no visual input

  • Input from other modalities may call up associated visual images from memory to be incorporated

  1. Retrograde memories (formed before blindness) were formed of events that included a visual component

  • Visual association cortex still exists (although receives no new input)

  • Visual memories stored in visual association cortex will still be available

  • The visual memories stored in visual association cortex can still cascade to associations to othermodality components - should be no effect of retrograde memories

Detecting a patient with VMDA – Farah’s Model

  1. Patient must be able to detect, draw or describe the visual properties of an object

  • Demonstrates that the deficit could not have arisen from motor, perceptual or linguistic impairment

  1. Patient must not be able to recognise an object on sight alone - indicating its name or function cannot match an intact percept of an object to a stored LTM representation of the object

  2. The patient should not be able to draw an object from memory, describe its visual characteristics from memory , or detect its visual image upon introspection cannot access the stored LTM representation of the object

Temporal Gradient – Rubin & Greenwood (1998)

  • Predicted that these amnesic patients would have no sparing of childhood memories - which characterises nearly all other forms of amnesia

  • The temporal gradient in more common forms of amnesia is thought to arise because consolidation is achieved at various stages of completion leading to a failure in retention of the most recent memories

  • In this predicted form of amnesia - the deficit arises NOT from a loss of retention of incompletely consolidated material - but from a loss of visual info itself - even older consolidated memories would be left with big gaps

Rubin & Greenberg (1998)

  • 11 cases in the literature met the criteria for a visual memory deficit

  • The data available fitted the predictions of VMDA with only 4 exceptions

  • VMDA is a new classification of amnesia - unlike other forms of amnesia – is caused by a loss of posterior neocortex rather than damage to the MTL or diencephalon region

  • Although it is rare – it is frequent enough to establish that it properties distinguish it from other types of amnesia

Case MH – supportive of VMDA Ogden (1993)

  • 24yr old man injured in motorcycle crash

  • Damage bilaterally to occipital lobes - no damage reported to frontal or temporal lobes (not MTL or diencephalon – not standard amnesia)

  • Originally assessed as blind - 21m later reassessed + responded to some visual stimuli

  1. He could copy line...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Neuropsychology of Memory Notes.