Bronner v Mediaprint [1998] Case C-7/97
By Oxbridge Law TeamUpdated 04/01/2024 07:12
Reviewed ByOxbridge Law Team
Judgement for the case Bronner v Mediaprint
Table Of Contents
Little publishers, Bonner, complained that it wasn't getting access to distribution system of large media-print and this was abuse.
Held
No, there were other ways of getting distribution, they were simply less advantageous.
The facility of the dominant company was NOT, on these facts, indispensable and impossible to replicate. (e.g a railway track)
Any comments or edits about this case? Get in touch
For Further Study on Bronner v Mediaprint
1,014 total pages
1036 purchased
IP law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Cambridge. Th...
Need instant answers? Our AI exam tutor is here to help.
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get StartedSimilar Cases
Related Product Samples
These product samples contain the same concepts we cover in this case.
| Intellectual Property Law | Copyright 3 (Infringement) Cases (9 pages) |
Claim every advantage to get a first in law
389 total pages
392 purchased
Competition Law notes fully updated for recent exams at Oxford and Camb...
Since 2010, Oxbridge Notes has been a trusted education marketplace, supplying high-quality materials from top achievers at universities like Oxford, Cambridge, LSE, Harvard, and Yale.