Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Bronner v Mediaprint

[1998] Case C-7/97

Case summary last updated at 27/01/2020 19:51 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team.

Judgement for the case Bronner v Mediaprint

Little publishers, Bonner, complained that it wasn't getting access to distribution system of Large media-print and this was abuse.

Held: No, there were other ways of getting distribution, they were simply less advantageous. The facility of the dominant company was NOT, on these facts, indispensable and impossible to replicate. (e.g a railway track)

Have you seen Oxbridge Notes' best Competition Law study materials?

Our law notes have been a popular underground sensation for 10 years:

  • Written by Oxford & Cambridge prize-winning graduates
  • Includes copious adademic commentary in summary form
  • Concise structure relating cases and statutes into an easy-to-remember whole
  • Covers all major cases for LLB exams
  • Satisfaction guaranteed refund policy
  • Recently updated
Competition Law Notes

Competition Law Notes >>