Introduction
• 2 aspects to the beginning of the Reformation
Coherent theology for new beliefs
Action based on beliefs / consequences of Luther’s ideas
• 1517 - famous date of apparent 95 theses
• Definition of Reformation - internal development of theology v. external reforms
• Issue of having convenient date of 31 October or 1 November 1517 - can the 'Reformation' merely begin at a certain place and a certain time?
More nuanced view of spreading ideas of reform and coalescing around certain dates
• Further importance of the notion of schism - claimed that he did not want it => yet becomes acceptant of the idea and this can be said to determine later relations
Much more aggressive and eager to immediately condemn
• Other prime mover is the pope - defines whether the Reformation as a schism must occur
95 theses
Attack on indulgences and mercenary church
Repentance
Contrition cannot be bought - indulgences should include ideas of regret
• Some foreshadowing of later radicalism - emphasis on scripture, faith + repentance
Christians being misled + 'treasure' of word of God
Convenient date to provide beginning
Doubt whether there is an actual date
Not 1517
• Carlstadt had also had theses
Catholic remnants + lack of action
• Theology of 1517 was in no way fully developed
• Still accepted purgatory and indulgences - did not question sacrament of penance and very notion of good works
• Importance of repentance
• Still hoped for reform
• Issue of schism - wishes to get reform => hoped that pope was unaware of abuses
• Radical ideas led to Diet of Augsburg + Leipzig Debate (1519)
Justification by faith alone - 1517 => defends at Augsburg 1518
The more important potential 'event' of 1517 - tower moment
• Difficult to date
• 1517 - Justification by faith alone - due to grace of God
The main Christian tenet of faith
1515 lecturing on St Paul’s letter to the Romans + the just living by faith alone => meaning?
• Generally dated before 1518 + c. 1517- described later his tower experience
~ Sat in a tower and gets to Romans 1.17 - ‘the righteousness of God is revealed . . . the righteous shall live by faith’
~ Revealed in the Gospel
~ Reinterpretation - not behaviour but grace of God
~ Onus is on God rather than on humanity
~ Peace to the terrified heart
• It is this which truly refutes indulgences and informed the priesthood of all believers
Underlying doctrine of all Luther's theology
• Central importance of faith - how to achieve salvation => formulated by 1518 with justification by faith
Yet promulgated in the vernacular in 1520 => new religion + reformation
• It was particularly this which informed his aggression in 1518-19
1518 Cajetan + Augsburg 1519
• By 1518, however, Luther was becoming more aggressive
Large group taken to Augsburg - clerk saw them as aggressive
• 1518 Cajetan - Augsburg
Pope could and did err
Justification by faith - 'no one can be justified except by faith'
Uses Spalatin to disseminate certain points to the Elector - letters
• Leipzig 1519 - Eck
Public statement of beliefs
Word of God
Impossible reconciliation with Church
• Critical of Eck's envy
It was only after this - 3 years later - that pope issued exsurge domine, 41/95 theses were heretical
1520 + Excommunication
• 1520 treatises date the real turning point
First proper written message of justification by faith - the main tenet
Vernacular
Beginnings of schism due to exsurge domine - To the Christian Nobility uses the word 'reformation' a lot more => laying down what must be done
Acceptance of schism following Exsurge Domine in June 1520 => martyrdom + schism
• Time when the 1517 theses became the 'Ninety Five Theses'
• Major consolidation of theology => Excommunication
• Beginnings of Reformation - creation of Cranach's etchings
Bob Scribner - major importance of images to spreading ideas
• To The Christian Nobility
First proper definition of priesthood of all believers
Sola scriptura
Intervention of nobility
• Babylonian captivity
3 sacraments
Lord's Supper
• Freedom of a Christian
• First and third were written in German - transition to a vernacular reformer => turning point
• Turning point from reform in tradition of Erasmus - this is what constituted the Reformation
OTBC - 'the breach is irreparable'
1521-2 - radicalising of the Reformation
• Triumphal progress to Worms - already popular by this point
McGrath and biographers such as Oberman - major importance of this event
Luther is risking martyrdom
Yet also first large 'external' event => becoming popular and demand for woodcuts
• Yet dangerous - made comparison to Christ travelling to crucifixion => in favour of truth
• Hus had had safe conduct - yet had still been burnt - precedent
• Major importance of hearing him speak
Duke of Schleswig-Holstein - later King of Denmark
Larger room on the second day
Merchants hear him and spread ideas
• Also importance of letters - Luther creates semi-public documents and expects them to be preached (Lyndal Roper)
1522 => action based on 1520 treatises
• McGrath - Reformation started when Luther returned from the Wartburg to Wittenberg
• Carlstadt's actions in Wittenberg - removal of images + vernacular mass
May mark start of Reformation proper
• Dependent on definition of Reformation
Could be defined as when Carlstadt started to make real changes
• Transition from theology to reality
Conclusion
• Reformation was a continuous process - despite major importance of 1517, it was only a preliminary => only in Latin, aim for reform and reconciliation without desire for schism
More important theological developments in 1517 => yet had to wait until 1520 for these to be disseminated widely
• While Luther is the central character and his aggression influences our beliefs - the pope was the major factor
Excommunication threat in 1520 stimulated major treatises and actual excommunication in 1521 led to Diet of Worms => finalised schism - yet also due to Luther's intractable belief in justification by faith alone
• Reformation only becomes external due to growing interest and vernacular
• Luther becomes more radical and comes to accept potential martyrdom following Exsurge Domine
How revolutionary were the 95 Theses? (2012)
Are the 95 Theses essentially conservative? (2010)
Background - academic discourse
• Indulgences - could convert attrition (fear of punishment) into contrition => contrition was too hard to achieve
Absolution would remove guilt + eternal punishment - yet temporal punishment could still occur on earth or in purgatory
Guilt v. penalty
Venial v. mortal sins
Treasury of merits
Remission of temporal sin + absolution
• 1510 - beginning of new indulgences for building the new basilica of St Peter and to fund Archbishop Albrecht’s two archdioceses
• Purchaser would be granted absolution by a priest - could also buy remission of penalties for the dead without confession or contrition
Major issue of Tetzel
Also conflicted with Elector Frederick's relics
• Luther did not yet deny their validity but questioned their efficacy - necessity of sincere repentance
Penance is an internal attitude
• 1517 - apparently pinned 95 theses to the Church Door in Wittenberg (yet this is from Melancthon’s memoirs) => yet this was a university noticeboard
Written in Latin - for dispute will fellow academics
Debate over whether they were printed - several copies sent in letters
• Part of academic discourse of reform which many had called for e.g. Erasmus
• Carlstadt wrote 151 theses in 1516 => little effect
Hus had previously written against indulgences
• University of Wittenberg had been founded in 1502 - very new university
Luther is not very well respected at this point - theses can only have a limited effect
Purpose of the 95 theses - against Tetzel
• Luther did not intend to be revolutionary - just wanted reform
• Sent a copy to Archbishop Albrecht of Mainz and Magdeburg - wanted him to stop selling indulgences => one aim, not revolutionary
• Not even so interested in basic theology - just against present situation of indulgence selling
• Criticism of Tetzel rather than the Pope
50. Building the pope’s basilica ‘with the skin, flesh and bones of his sheep’
• Fleshly rather than spiritual
• 42. ‘the pope does not intend that the buying of indulgences should in any way be compared with works of mercy’
Believes that the pope is unaware
• Against deception of the people - believe they are effectively buying salvation
Radicalism
• 5 + 6. Pope cannot remit any guilt except that which has been remitted by God
Questioning the power of the papacy
• 32. Those who believe that they can be certain of their salvation because they have indulgence letters will be eternally damned, together with their teachers’
• 62 - true treasure is the word of God
Use of word 'treasure' - implies the treasury of merits given by Christ => given to entire church - writes on these 'keys' in To the Christian Nobility
Pope - intercession rather than power over keys
• 45 - Better to give to the poor than to buy indulgences - indulgences do not make a man better but merely free him from penalties
95 - false security of peace => need 'tribulations'
• Yet much of this was not actually against indulgences - just against wrong approach whereby people did not need to be contrite
• Christians are currently being misled - should be confident of entering heaven
Rhetorical questions + interference
• Idea that pope was unknowing - bones of his sheep to make...