This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

LPC Law Notes Employment Law Notes

Discrimination Notes

Updated Discrimination Notes

Employment Law Notes

Employment Law

Approximately 388 pages

A collection of the best LPC Employment notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (a former Oxford law graduate) could find in 2014 after combing through seventeen LPC samples from outstanding students with the highest results in England and carefully evaluating each on accuracy, formatting, logical structure, spelling/grammar, conciseness and "wow-factor". In short these are what we believe to be the strongest set of Employment Law notes available in the UK this year. This collection of notes is full...

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Employment Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Discrimination

Equality Act 2010

  • Job applicants, employees and workers are protected - ss.39 – 40 EA10.

  • Protected characteristics: s.4

    • Age - s.5 (by reference to an age/range of ages)

  • Disability - defined in s.6

    1. Physical/mental impairment (affects normal day to day activities)

      • Goodwin v Patent Office: focus on what claimant cannot do/cannot do without difficulty.

      • Pyromania, alcohol and drug abuse are specifically excluded under the 2010 Regs.

      • Power v Panasonic: need not consider cause of impairment.

    2. has a long term, substantial adverse effect.

      • s.212(1): substantial = more than minor/trivial (consider effect of impairment rather than severity)

      • Schedule 1, paragraph 2(1): long-term = lasted/likely to last at least 12 months or the rest of the person's life (whichever shorter)

        • Determined at date of hearing

        • Recurring/fluctuating conditions can count - likely recurrence (Sch.1 para 2(2))

          • SCA Packaging v Boyle: likely = 'could well happen'.

  • People suffering from HIV, cancer and multiple sclerosis are to be considered disabled from the point of diagnosis (Schedule 1, paragraph 6), and sufferers do not have to prove all of the elements set out above (Schedule 1, paragraph 9)

  • Claims: Includes discrimination for association with a disabled person (carers)

    • Direct discrimination - s.13(1) (comparator = someone without claimant's disability but whose circumstances are not otherwise materially different - s.23(1) and (2))

  • Indirect discrimination

  • Discrimination arising from disability - s.15 (no comparator needed)

    1. Unfavourable treatment due to disability

    2. Not a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim

    3. Causal link (can be very loose)

    4. Defence = employer did not know/could not reasonably be expected to know that the claimant was disabled

  • Failure to comply with duty to make reasonable adjustments in s.20

    • Applies at all stages of employment process:

      • s.20(3): changing the way things are done

      • s.20(4): changing the build environment

      • s.20(5): providing aids and services

    • s.21: failure to comply = discrimination

      • Cannot pass on cost to employee

      • Positive obligation to consider reasonable adjustments

      • No justification for failing to make reasonable adjustments (Schedule 8, paragraph 20: unless employer does not know of disability)

      • Poor practice & employer's own policies are useful

  • Harassment

  • Victimisation

  • Race - s.9 (includes: colour, (legal) nationality, ethnic or national origin)

    • BBC Scotland v Souster: England and Scotland = different national origins.

    • Mandla v Lee: ethnic group =

      1. Long shared history, distinguishing it from other groups

      2. Cultural tradition of its own including family/social customs

    • Chandhok & Anor v Tirkey: ethic origins = wide enough to encompass caste.

  • Religion or belief - s.10

    • Religious/philosophical belief or lack thereof

    • Philosophical belief = genuinely held, not opinion/view, as to weighty and substantial aspect of human life, certain level of cogency/seriousness, be worthy of respect in a democratic society.

      • Nicholson v Grainger PLC: belief in climate change upheld.

  • Sex - s.11

    • NB. Contractual protections for equal pay

    • NB. Equality Act (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2016 - April 2017

  • Sexual orientation - s.12(1)

  • Gender reassignment

  • Marriage/civil partnership

  • Pregnancy/maternity

  • Prohibited conduct:

    1. Direct discrimination - s.13(1) - treated less favourably

      1. Protected characteristic (whether actual, perceived or associated with another who has a protected characteristic)

      2. Treated less favourably: compared to treatment of others even if hypothetical (comparator whose circumstances cannot be materially different from the claimant's - s.23)

      3. Causal link

Defences: Schedule 9, paragraph 1

  • Protected characteristic is an occupational requirement (genuinely crucial to the post); &

  • Application of requirement is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim; &

  • Person to whom it is applied does not meet it (to the reasonable satisfaction of the person who applies it - except sex)

Schedule 9, paragraph 2

  • Applies specifically to ministers of religion

Age discrimination defence: s.13(2)

  • Proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim

  • Schedule 9: other specific exceptions relating to age (pay, minimum wage, enhanced redundancy payments, life assurances, job applicant at/nearing retirement age)

  • Seldon v Clarkson, Wright and Jakes: compulsory retirement age was directly discriminatory but that that retirement age was capable of being a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim - i.e. staff retention and workplace planning.

  1. Indirect discrimination - s.19

    • Provision appears neutral but causes a disadvantage to one group

  1. Provision, criterion or practice applied/would be applied (PCP imposed)

  2. Put claimant's group at a particular disadvantage (comparison between 'pools' of people - statistics are useful as proof)

  1. Put claimant at a disadvantage (personal disadvantage)

  2. Can employer show PCP was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim (objectively balance effect on claimant with reasonable needs of employer)

    • CHEZ Razpredelenie Bulgaria: potentially widens scope - need not show protected characteristic yourself, enough to be part of a disadvantaged group.

  1. Harassment - s.26

    1. Unwanted conduct (consider what perpetrator should have known)

      • E.g. Moonsar v Fiveways: downloading porn in same room as female claimant.

    2. Purpose or effect (intention of harasser is irrelevant)

    3. Violating dignity/creating intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment

      • Combination of objective test of reasonableness with employee's subjective perception (s.26(4))

      • Harassment of a sexual nature = s.26(2)

      • Submission to / rejection of harassment = unlawful to treat a person less...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Employment Law Notes.