Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Dimskel Shipping Co. V. International Transport Workers Federation Notes

BCL Law Notes > Restitution of Unjust Enrichment BCL Notes

This is an extract of our Dimskel Shipping Co. V. International Transport Workers Federation document, which we sell as part of our Restitution of Unjust Enrichment BCL Notes collection written by the top tier of Oxford students.

The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Restitution of Unjust Enrichment BCL Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

DIMSKEL SHIPPING CO. V. INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT WORKERS FEDERATION FACTS A vessel owned by the plaintiffs, manned by 10 Greek and 20 Filipino nationals and flying the Panamanian flag, berthed at a Swedish port and commenced loading. An official of the Swedish Transport Workers' Union, an affiliate of the defendants, acting as an agent of the I.T.F. and in pursuance of the I.T.F.'s campaign against the registration of vessels under flags of convenience, informed the master, officers and crew that the vessel would be blacked unless the plaintiffs entered into I.T.F. employment contracts with the crew. Subsequently an employee of the Swedish Seamen's Union, acting as an agent of both the I.T.F. and the union, in pursuance of the flags of convenience campaign demanded, inter alia, payment of crew members' wages calculated in accordance with I.T.F. wage scales and backdated to the commencement of the employment of the crew members; provision of a bank performance guarantee in the sum of U.S.$200,000 in London; deeds of undertaking that the plaintiffs would not institute proceedings against the Filipino crew members; provision of I.T.F. employment contracts for all crew members; that the plaintiffs should sign a document declaring that they were complying voluntarily with the I.T.F.'s demands; and letters of indemnity for all crew members. Those demands were accompanied by a threat that if they were not met the vessel would be blacked. On 7 March, as a result of the threatened and actual blacking, the plaintiffs signed the required and other contractual documents and procured the issue of a performance bond. The plaintiffs subsequently sought declarations that they had lawfully avoided on the ground of duress all the contracts entered into with the I.T.F. in consequence of the latter's actions, and claimed restitution of the sums totalling U.S.$111,743 and damages for the torts of intimidation and interference with contractual rights. Note: Under the 1974 Labour Relations Act as it stood when the case of Universe Tankships was decided, immunity was available or actions of this nature. But by the time this case came to be decided, the 1974 legislation had been amended by the 1980 Act which provided no immunity for "secondary actions". This case fell into that category of cases because the threatened blacking was to be carried out by employees of the Swedish Port authority. Claim: In the present action, the owners claimed declarations that they had lawfully avoided all the above contracts on the ground of duress, including the contracts with the I.T.F. and the contracts with the Filipino seamen. They claimed restitution in respect of the

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Restitution of Unjust Enrichment BCL Notes.

More Restitution Of Unjust Enrichment Bcl Samples