This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

BCL Law Notes Restitution of Unjust Enrichment BCL Notes

Jones V. Churcher Notes

Updated Jones V. Churcher Notes

Restitution of Unjust Enrichment BCL Notes

Restitution of Unjust Enrichment BCL

Approximately 620 pages

These are detailed case summaries (excerpts from cases - not paraphrased) I made during the Oxford BCL for the Restitution of Unjust Enrichment course....

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Restitution of Unjust Enrichment BCL Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Jones v. Churcher

Facts

The claimant, Stephen Jones, is a car dealer trading under the name of The Chelsea Car Company from office premises in Battersea. At the time of the CHAPS transfer to Miss Churcher he employed two people, a mechanic, and a secretary, Miss Annabel Loveday.

Jones and Sharky established contact: Mr Jones began acquiring his cars through Mr Sharkey rather than through Mr Warnock. Mr Sharkey's source of supply was a VW dealer in Dublin.

Jones Started ordering cars through Sharky: The import price of a new VW Golf GT-TDI in 2005 and early 2006 was about 14,300 inclusive of VAT. This was a significant discount on the showroom price of an authorised UK dealer. Mr Sharkey told Mr Jones in 2005 that he could supply through Murway as many as 100 cars. Mr Jones did not commit The Chelsea Car Company to so large a number: but he placed a number of orders with Murway which were successfully delivered.

Money Transfers made to Sharky: It was Mr Sharkey who gave Mr Jones details of the bank account to which payment to Murway should be made. Until October 2005 it was an account with Barclays. Then it was switched to an account with NatWest. Payments addressed to Murway were made to both accounts without a problem and the cars were duly delivered. Then, in February 2006, Mr Sharkey told Mr Jones that Murway was experiencing banking difficulties and he provided Mr Jones with details of a different bank account.

First payment to Churcher’s account (not a mistake this time): The cost was 14,300. When the order was relayed to Mr Sharkey, he sent a text message to Mr Jones asking for payment to be made to an account number 94270991 at Abbey National, The Bridge, Walsall in the name of K. Churcher. This was Miss Churcher's personal bank account, details of which Mr Sharkey had obtained in circumstances I will mention presently.

Second Transfer: Intended for a car company but made by mistake to Churcher’s Account:

Within days of this order, Mr Jones told Mr Sharkey that he wanted another 5 VW Golfs from Murway. Mr Sharkey replied that, owing to continuing banking difficulties being experienced by Murway, payment for the cars should be made to an account number 06165821 with the Bank of Scotland in the name of Lophius Trading Ltd. Mr Jones assumed that Lophius was in some way connected with Murway.

Miss Loveday prepared a CHAPS transfer form for payment of a sum of 42,300. Since Mr Jones was out of the office, and she was not an authorised signatory for The Chelsea Car Company, she had to resort to subterfuge to get his signature on the form. She went to the previous forms on the file and looked for one with a signature bearing a similar date. She found a CHAPS form signed by Mr Jones on 7th February 2006 on which (as was his custom) he had added the date immediately under his signature as “7/2/06”. She photocopied the form, cut out the signature and date, and pasted it onto the new form. All would or might have been well if she had correctly completed the beneficiary's details: but she did not. In error she did not take the beneficiary details from what should have been the immediately preceding CHAPS form in her CHAPS file i.e. the form for the transfer to Lophius on 24th February. She took the beneficiary details from the CHAPS form for the transfer on 21st February which were the details for Miss Churcher's account. In consequence the 42,300 was sent to Miss Churcher's account on the afternoon of 7th March, not to the account of Lophius.

Jones realized the mistaken payment

Mr Jones realised that a mistake had been made when Mr Sharkey phoned him the next day to complain that no payment for the 3 cars had been received. He checked his firm's CHAPS records and saw that the money had been sent to Miss Churcher rather than to Lophius. Mr Jones immediately set about trying to rectify the mistake.

Either later the same day or on the following day (10th March) Mr Jones made contact with Mr Sharkey by phone and explained what had happened to the first payment of 42,300 and how he had just replaced it with a second payment. He asked Mr Sharkey to get in touch with Miss Churcher and get her to send the first payment back. Mr Sharkey replied that he would try to contact Miss Churcher and get the money back somehow.

Sharky took the money from Jones’ account

Mr Sharkey did indeed contact Miss Churcher: but not in order to persuade her to repay The Chelsea Car Company. He rang her on Sunday, 12th March and began by saying that she had money in her bank account which he wanted. She was cross with him because she thought he had deliberately used her account a second time without permission. I accept Miss Churcher's evidence that Mr Sharkey told her that the money was needed for another car transaction and that it had been paid into her account by mistake. He asked for the money back, starting with an immediate 500 in cash.

Churcher explained to Jones that the money had been paid to Sharky

Mr Jones turned his attention to Miss Churcher. He got his solicitors to write to her c/o Abbey National's Clearing Centre. The letter demanded return of the 42,300 by 14th...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Restitution of Unjust Enrichment BCL Notes.

More Restitution Of Unjust Enrichment Bcl Samples