Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Defamation Liability Notes

GDL Law Notes > GDL Tort Law Notes

Updates Available  

A more recent version of these Defamation Liability notes – written by Cambridge/Bpp/College Of Law students – is available here.

The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our GDL Tort Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Tort: Defamation - Liability Introduction + General Principles

- Defamation: to protect c. from untrue statements that harm his reputation. (cf. malicious falsehood: untrue statement that does not damage reputation but does harm). balance between 2 interests:

1. public interest: freedom of expression.
? large variety of defences: to protect d's freedom of expression.

2. private interest: maintaining reputation.
+ Human Rights Act 1998: Art 10 ECHR - guarantees freedom of expression vs. Art 8 ECHR - right to private + family life.

- Definitions:
[Winfield]: publication of a statement which reflects on a person's reputation and tends to lower him in the estimation of right thinking members of society generally or tends to make them shun or avoid him. Sim v Stretch [1936]: [Ld Atkin]: statement which tend to lower the claimant in the estimation of right-thinking members of society generally, and in particular to cause him to be regarded with feelings hatred, contempt, ridicule, fear and disesteem.

2 Torts: Libel + Slander

- Libel: statement in some permanent form - e.g. pictures, printed words etc. ? actionable per se. radio + TV - s166 + s201 Broadcasting Act 1990. public plays - s4 Theatres Act 1968. waxworks - Monson v Madame Tussaud's Ltd [1894]: waxwork of c. placed in chamber of horrors; c. had been tried for murder but acquitted ? [Ropes LJ]: statues, caricatures, effigies, chalk marks, signs, pictures also.

films - Youssoupoff v MGM Pictures Ltd [1934]: film suggested c. had been raped by Rasputin internet - Godfrey v Demon Internet [1994]. inc. social networking (even if semi-private) - Applause Stores Productions Ltd v Raphael [2008].

- Slander: statement in temporary/transitory form ? actionable only with proof of special damages (but 4 exceptions). transient forms: e.g. spoken word, gestures, mimes, impressions, noises. debate: audio stored on CD, tape, DVD ? [Winfield]: libel; vs. [Street]: slander (libel inherently visual). 4 exceptions - slander actionable per se if:

1. imputation of imprisonable offence: Gray v Jones [1939]; Webb v Beavan [1883].

2. imputation of having contagious/unsociable disease: Bloodworth v Gray [1844].

3. imputation of unchasity of adultery in female: s1 Slander of Women Act 1891. Kerr v Kennedy [1942]: inc. suggestion that c. is (sexually active) lesbian.

4. imputation of unfitness for trade, profession or appointment: s2 Defamation Act 1952. e.g. Jones v Jones [1916]; Hopwood v Muirson [1945]; McManus v Beckham [2002]: Victoria Beckham told customers in shop that David Beckham's autograph for sale fake.

Locus Standi: Who Can Sue?

- Natural + legal persons can sue. natural persons: but not dead - if c. dies before trial, action dies with him. corporate bodies: where statement defames corporate reputation. McDonalds Corporation v Steel [1999]: McDonalds succeeded in libel suit vs. environmentalists.

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our GDL Tort Law Notes.

More GDL Tort Law Samples