GDL Law Notes > Cambridge/Bpp/College Of Law GDL Law Notes > GDL Tort Law Notes

Trespass To The Person Notes

This is a sample of our (approximately) 4 page long Trespass To The Person notes, which we sell as part of the GDL Tort Law Notes collection, a D package written at Cambridge/Bpp/College Of Law in 2017 that contains (approximately) 463 pages of notes across 55 different documents.

Learn more about our GDL Tort Law Notes

The original file is a 'Word (Docx)' whilst this sample is a 'PDF' representation of said file. This means that the formatting here may have errors. The original document you'll receive on purchase should have more polished formatting.

Trespass To The Person Revision

The following is a plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our GDL Tort Law Notes. This text version has had its formatting removed so pay attention to its contents alone rather than its presentation. The version you download will have its original formatting intact and so will be much prettier to look at.

Revision: Tort

[TRESPASS TO THE PERSON]

Right of protection from deliberate physical harm, unlawful contact and from unjustified restriction of liberty (Assault, Battery and False Imprisonment) - All actionable per se

Battery "Direct and intentional application of force by the defendant to the claimant without lawful justification'
 Intentional:

Must prove either: a) Intention (to touch, not to hurt); or, b) Recklessness (foreseeing the likelihood of act causing the application of force)

More than mere negligence

Fowler v Lanning: no liability if unintentional (here the claimant was shot unintentionally so no liability)

 Direct (direct foreseeability)

Reynolds v Clarke: act must cause an 'immediate wrong'

Scott v Shepherd: there was sufficient directness where Scott through a lighted squib into a market place

DPP v K: schoolboy poured sulphuric acid into hand-drier, another student got it on his face - sufficiently direct

Fagan v Commissioner of Met Police: discussion of what constitutes an 'act - defendant parked on a policeman's foot, then refused to move - the mens rea occurred during the actus rea, thus his act couldn't be regarded as a mere omission

 Application of force

Any physical contact - no need for actual damage

Cole v Turner: "the least touching of another"

R v Cotesworth: spitting in a doctor's face was a battery 1

****************************End Of Sample*****************************

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our GDL Tort Law Notes.