This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

LPC Law Notes Civil Litigation Notes

Case Management Summary Case Managment Conference Notes

Updated Case Management Summary Case Managment Conference Notes

Civil Litigation Notes

Civil Litigation

Approximately 418 pages

A collection of the best LPC Civil Litigation notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find after combing through dozens of LPC samples from outstanding students with the highest results in England and carefully evaluating each on accuracy, formatting, logical structure, spelling/grammar, conciseness and "wow-factor".

In short these are what we believe to be the strongest set of Civil Lit notes available in the UK this year. This collection of notes is fully updated ...

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Civil Litigation Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Case Management

The court must further the overriding objective of dealing with cases justly by active case management. This means that once a case has been allocated to a track, the court will give directions as to how that case is to proceed to trial. Ultimately, this is done by the court setting a timetable of steps that the parties must follow. But first the court will want to identify the issues in dispute between the parties: i.e. decide which of those issues need to be fully investigated and direct the parties as to how that investigation is to be conducted.

To help the court carry out these tasks, particularly in a complex multi-track case, the court will usually require the parties to attend at a case management conference and to prepare a case summary for that hearing.

Before we look in detail at those matters, let’s reflect on where we are in the litigation process, how we got there and where case management will take us to next in the proceedings.

The court will actively manage a case at Stage 3, the interim phase of civil litigation. So, what exactly does this entail and how does it fit into the civil litigation process?

Stage 1

The parties normally communicate details of their respective cases

1. Before litigation starts, details of the claim should normally be set out in writing by the claimant and sent to the defendant. The Defendant will then respond. Sometimes a settlement can be reached through a series of letters, telephone calls and meetings or even through the adoption of a successful ADR procedure. If not,

2. the pre-action steps taken should help identify what legal and factual issues remain in dispute between the parties. These issues will subsequently be detailed in court proceedings as statements of case. (Only a few documents may be shown (for tactical reasons not everything is said/shown))

Stage 2

The basic details of any claim, defence and counterclaim are set out in the statements of case

  • A Claim is started by the claimant completing a claim form which is then filed at the appropriate court.

  • This is a prescribed form containing only basic details about the parties and the nature of the claim.

  • The material facts on which the claimant relies should be concisely set out in the Particular of Claim.

  • If the defendant wishes to resist the claim, each and every allegation should be answered in a Defence by way of admission, -non-admission or denial.

  • If the defendant has a claim against the claimant – a defence and counterclaim can be made using the same document.

Stage 3

the interim phase

At Stage 1 the parties normally communicate details of their respective cases, at Stage 2 the basic details of any claim, defence and counterclaim are set out in the statements of case. It is only at Stage 3 that the detailed evidence used at trial is addressed. A statement of case is just the bare bones of a party’s case. What “flesh” can be put on by way of factual an expert evidence is a matter for the court to decide. Assuming the Particulars of Claim and any counterclaim have properly set out the allegations and that each of these has been answered by the defence by way of admission, -non-admission or denial – a comparison of the documents should allow the parties to formulate the issues in dispute.

This analysis is essential in most multi-track cases when preparing a case summary for a case management conference. At that conference the court will:

  1. set a timetable of steps the parties must take in order to prepare the case for trial. This normally starts with the disclosure and inspection by the parties of certain documents.

  2. This is followed by the exchange of evidence that the parties intend to rely on. This often includes formal, written, factual statements form non-expert witnesses and written experts’ reports.

Whatever track the case is on, the parties will work towards either a known trial date or at least a period of time in the future when the trial will occur.

Stage 4

Trial

A trial on the small claims track is informal and conducted at the discretion of the judge. However, the formal rules of evidence apply on the fast track and multi-track. At the end of the fast track trial, the judge will give a decision on the legal and factual issues and decide which party, if any, should pay the costs of the opponent and the amount of those costs. On the Multi-Track, the trial judge decides the legal and factual issues and who should pay costs but the amount of those costs is determined subsequently by a different judge, known as a costs judge.

Stage 5

Appeal

On all tracks a party may decide to appeal all or part of the trial judge’s decision. Subject to any appeal, a party awarded damages and/or costs will expect to be paid by the date set by the court. But what if that does not happen? The answer is that the party will have to apply to the court to enforce the judgement.

Case management conference

Now let’s focus on the multi-track and the case summary that needs to be prepared for a case management conference. A case summary should assist the judge at the conference to understand the proceedings and decide how the case should be prepared for trial. The case summary needs to be:

  1. clear and concise,

  2. Normally it shouldn’t exceed 500 words,

  3. It should be prepared by the claimant.

  4. However, the other parties should be asked to comment on it and, if possible, its contents should be agreed, with a note being made of any disagreement.

Case Summary

Now we will consider how to draft a case summary. A case summary, to be used at a case management conference, should contain certain information. The important skill to use when drafting a summary is case analysis.

Formalities
  • The case summary starts by looking a bit like a statement of case.

  • The heading should have the name of the court,

  • the claim number and the title of the proceedings,

  • The date that the case management conference is set to occur should be identified.

  • If the document is...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Civil Litigation Notes.

More Civil Litigation Samples