This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

LPC Law Notes Civil Litigation Notes

Evidence Expert Notes

Updated Evidence Expert Notes

Civil Litigation Notes

Civil Litigation

Approximately 418 pages

A collection of the best LPC Civil Litigation notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find after combing through dozens of LPC samples from outstanding students with the highest results in England and carefully evaluating each on accuracy, formatting, logical structure, spelling/grammar, conciseness and "wow-factor".

In short these are what we believe to be the strongest set of Civil Lit notes available in the UK this year. This collection of notes is fully updated ...

Available here

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Civil Litigation Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Define

  • An expert is a person who has been instructed to give expert evidence for proceedings (r.35.2)

  • An expert’s opinion on a relevant matter on which he is qualified to give evidence is admissible (s.3(1) CEA) apply O5.1, O4 and IB5.5 (solicitor mustn’t mislead court with untrue evidence)

  • An expert cannot be instructed under a CFA
Admissibility

  1. It must be relevant and within the expertise of the expert

  2. Must be presented to court in the correct format (r.35 and PD 35)

  3. Permission was given by the court (r.35.4) which will limit to the evidence reasonable to resolve proceedings (r.35.1)

  • Conflict does not automatically disqualify the expert (Toth), but it must be disclosed ASAP
Restriction

The court can, at it’s discretion:

  • Declare whether expert evidence is allowed at all

  • Limit the number of experts used

  • Preclude oral evidence in favour of solely written reports

  • Direct the parties to use a single joint expert

  • Limit the amount of expert fees that a party can seek to recover
Contents

  • r.35.3: the expert’s duty is to help the court not the instructing party

  • Where there is reference to the Protocol, see the tabbed sheet for more detail

  • r.35.10: is must comply with PD 35 (Note; see separate sheet for more detail on Protocol):

    • Para 3.1: addressed to the court not the instructing party

    • Para 3.2: it must

  1. Give details of the expert’s qualifications (Protocol 13.6)

  2. Give details of literature or other material which has been relied upon in making the report (Protocol 13.8)

  3. Contain a statement setting out the substance of facts and instructions (Protocol 13.15)

  4. Make clear what is within the expert’s knowledge and what is the expert’s opinion (Protocol 13.9, 13.10 and 13.11)

  5. Say who carried out any experiment that the expert has used for the report, their qualifications and methodology used (Protocol 13.7(a) and (b))

  6. Where there is a range of opinion:

  1. Summarise the range of opinion and qualifications (Protocol 13.12)

  2. Give reasons for the expert’s own opinion (Protocol 13.13)

  1. Contain a summary of the conclusions reached (Protocol 13.14)

  2. State the qualification of an opinion

  3. Contain a statement that the expert:

  1. Understands and has complied with their duty to the court

  2. Aware of requirements of Part 35, PD and protocol of expert evidence

  • Para 3.3: must contain a statement of truth in the following form: “I confirm that I have made clear which facts and matter referred to in this report are within my own knowledge and which are not. Those that are within my own knowledge I confirm to be true. The opinions I have expressed represent my true and complete professional opinions on the matters to which they refer”
Defective Opponent’s Report
Possible Action Pros and Cons
Do nothing

  • This is not acting in the best interests of your client
Do nothing ‘til trial then ask judge to exclude the evidence for non-compliance

  • This would annoy the judge – why not say earlier?

  • Breach of r.1.1(2)(a) & r.1.3 (duty to assist court in furthering OO).

  • Should point out errors in others’ report.

  • Risk of adverse costs order under r.44.5(3)
Inform C directly that his solicitors have been negligent

  • IB11.4: don’t contact other side directly (unless they don’t have legal representation) + IB11.1
Inform the expert that you will report him to his governing body

  • This is the judge’s job (Meadows v GMC)
Inform C’s solicitor: defects must be corrected and permission obtained to rely on the amended report

  • This is the best response
Interim application to exclude the C’s expert evidence

  • Disproportionate response (use as a back-up)

  • Occasions delay and expense

  • Possible adverse costs consequences.

Asking the Other Expert Questions

r.35.6

  • Written questions within 28 days of the service of the report directly to the expert (1)(a) & (2)(b)

  • Must simultaneously send copy of the questions to the instructing party

  • Must be to clarify the report (unless agreed otherwise) ((2)(c))

  • May submit questions only once ((2)(a))

  • Answers will be treated as part of the report, so should be given in writing ((3))
Disclosure
Disclosure of Instructions Disclosure of Report

  • r.35.10(4) instructions are privileged from inspection unless the court makes an order under the rules

  • This will only be made if there are reasonable grounds for believing statement of instruction is inaccurate

  • If want to rely on it, then you must disclose it to other parties as per directions

  • When first obtained, report is privileged if prepared for the dominant purpose of litigation

  • If don’t rely on it, must put it in Part 2 of the disclosure list

Discussions Between Experts

r.35.12
General

  • Without prejudice discussions to narrow down the issues

  • Contents may be referred to at trial only by mutual consent (r.35.12(4))

Pre-meeting

(para 9.3)

  • Parties should discuss and agree on an agenda

  • Agenda must not be leading questions or in a hostile tone

At meeting

(para 9.2)

  • The experts should identify:

    • The extent to which they agree

    • Points of disagreement and reasons for it

    • Actions that could be taken to resolve any disagreement

  • Parties and legal representatives should not attend unless by mutual consent or the court gives such permission (para 9.5)

  • If they do attend, the should not intervene in the discussion
...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Civil Litigation Notes.

More Civil Litigation Samples