This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

LPC Law Notes Insurance Law Notes

Insurance Duty Of The Utmost Good Faith Notes

Updated Insurance Duty Of The Utmost Good Faith Notes

Insurance Law Notes

Insurance Law

Approximately 51 pages

A collection of the best LPC Insurance Law notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find after combing through twenty-nine LPC samples from outstanding students with the highest results in England and carefully evaluating each on accuracy, formatting, logical structure, spelling/grammar, conciseness and "wow-factor".

In short these are what we believe to be the strongest set of Insurance Law notes available in the UK this year. This collection of notes is fully updat...

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Insurance Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Insurance Duty of the Utmost Good Faith (DUGF)

Origin: Carter v. Boehm; Created by Lord Mansfield. UWs claimed they were not given sufficient details on just how vulnerable a fort in Sumatra was to attack by the French. They are argued the risk was not properly disclosed to them.

Rationale: An insurance contract is based upon speculation. Therefore the contracting party who has the knowledge of the risk has a DUGF to disclose any features that make the risk more likely. However, they have no duty to disclose anything that makes the risk less likely, is already known by the public generally or that a skilled underwriter should know.

Codification: S.17 Marine Insurance Act 1906 (MIA): Insurance contracts ‘based upon the utmost good faith’. The DUGF is effectively one of honesty and fairness.

  • Pinetop v. Panatlantic; H of L held that the s.17 statutory codification applies to both marine and non-marine risks.

It is a mutual duty owed by both parties. The parties can agree to limit the application of this duty; i.e. by waiving negligent or non-deliberate breaches. Consequence of breach is avoidance by the other party.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Placement Duties Owed by the Insured and Agents Placing Risk on their Behalf

Insured: Situation – When trying to procure a contract of insurance (either by agent or directly) the insured must disclose knowledge when drafting a proposed cover. The DUGF is owed until the contract is entered into.

  • S.18(1) MIA: ‘Assured must disclose to the insurer, before the contract is concluded, every material circumstance which is known (or deemed to be known) by the assured’. Failure = avoidance.

  • ‘Known’ under s.18 = Four types of knowledge. 1) Actual. 2) Attributed. 3) Constructive knowledge – deemed to know something they are ought to.

4) The insured has an ‘agent to know’s’ knowledge.

  • S.20(1) MIA: ‘Every material representation made by the assured, or his agent, to the insurer during negotiations for the contract and before the contract is concluded, must be true’. Failure = avoidance.

  • S.20(2) MIA: ‘Material’ = Must influence the judgment of a prudent underwriter in fixing a premium or deciding to take on a risk.

  • S.20(4) MIA: Representation as to a matter of fact = True if substantially correct.

  • S.20(5) MIA: Belief = True if made in good faith; i.e. believed to be true.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Insured’s Agent

Situation: An agent who is employed by the insured to place the contract of insurance owes a DUGF to the underwriter he places the risk with. So in an oral presentation of a risk to an underwriter there must be a ‘fair presentation’ of that risk.

Quotation: Before getting a premium quotation from an underwriter the broker agent should explain all risks.

Following insurance market: Each placement with an underwriter is a separate contractual negotiation so there is a separate DUGF owed to each party. A non-disclosure or misrepresentation will be committed if this does not happen.

  • S.19 MIA: The agent must disclose to the insurer all material circumstances.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What does ‘Materiality’ mean?

  • S.18(2) and 20(2) MIA: ‘Every circumstance is material which would influence the judgment of a prudent insurer in fixing the premium, or determining whether he will take the risk’. This is both an objective and subjective test.

Objective test: - Pinetop v. Panatlantic; The fact in question has to be one which a prudent underwriter would have wanted to know as it would have influenced their underwriting decision (I.e. premiums or term) but not necessarily decisively. Essentially it has to be a fact that increases the risk that the underwriter agreed to bear.

Evidence: An expert (an experienced underwriter who has been insuring risks in the London market) has...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Insurance Law Notes.