LPC Law Notes > Cambridge And Oxilp And College Of Law LPC Law Notes > Property Law and Practice Notes
Misrepresentation In A Property Transaction Diagram Notes
This is a sample of our (approximately) 4 page long Misrepresentation In A Property Transaction Diagram notes, which we sell as part of the Property Law and Practice Notes collection, a Distinction package written at Cambridge And Oxilp And College Of Law in 2016 that contains (approximately) 450 pages of notes across 126 different documents.
The original file is a 'Word (Doc)' whilst this sample is a 'PDF' representation of said file. This means that the formatting here may have errors. The original document you'll receive on purchase should have more polished formatting.
Misrepresentation In A Property Transaction Diagram Revision
The following is a plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Property Law and Practice Notes. This text version has had its formatting removed so pay attention to its contents alone rather than its presentation. The version you download will have its original formatting intact and so will be much prettier to look at.
Misrepresentation in a property transaction 1) Has there been a misrepresentation?
a) Misrepresentations arising out incorrect pre-contract enquiry responses
Would be actionable only after exchange of contracts
E.g. if the seller states in the enquiry response that there are no boundary disputes and post-contract it turns out there is an ongoing dispute about a boundary fence.
E.g. Covering over the physical defects (e.g. damp) with paint
b) Replying "not so far as the seller is aware" is an assertion that the seller had made reasonable investigations into the matter
if it turns out to be incorrect, can be sued for misrepresentation - William Sindall v Cambridgeshire County Council
2) What is the basis for a misrepresentation claim to be actionable?
Position under the Standard Commercial Property Conditions (SCPC) / Standard Conditions for Sale (SCS)
SCPC 9.1.1 If any statement made by the seller in the negotiations leading up to the contract is misleading or inaccurate.
SCPC 9.1.2 / SCS 7.1.1(a) - Damages Where there is a material difference between the description or value of the property represented, the buyer is entitled to damages
SCPC 9.1.3 / SCS 7.1.1(b) - Rescission and (implicitly damages as damages threshold passed) Where the seller acted fraudulently or recklessly, or where the buyer would be obliged to accept the property differing substantially in quantity, quality or tenure from what the misrepresentation led the buyer to expect, the buyer may rescind the contract.
Position under the common law and statute
Common law and Misrepresentation Act 1967 Would have to show that the seller had made a misrepresentation which included the buyer to enter into the contract (more difficult to satisfy than the position under the SCPC or SCS)
Misdescription - Rescission and damages If there is an error in the particulars of sale and the matter is sufficiently significant, the innocent party can seek rescission and damages
Misrepresentation - Damages under Misrepresentation Act 1967 This includes the loss resulting from incorrect replies to pre-contract enquiries.
3) Apply the facts to the law
SCPC 9.2 - Consequences of rescission If the buyer rescinds the seller will have to return the deposit and the various purchase papers
****************************End Of Sample*****************************
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Property Law and Practice Notes.