This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

BPTC Law Notes BPTC Criminal Litigation Notes

Arraignment And Pre Trial Matters Notes

Updated Arraignment And Pre Trial Matters Notes

BPTC Criminal Litigation Notes

BPTC Criminal Litigation

Approximately 1169 pages

A collection of the best BPTC notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find after combing through dozens of samples from outstanding students with the highest results in England and carefully evaluating each on accuracy, formatting, logical structure, spelling/grammar, conciseness and "wow-factor".

In short, these are what we believe to be the strongest set of BPTC notes available in the UK this year. This collection of BPTC notes is fully updated for recent exams, ...

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our BPTC Criminal Litigation Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Pre Trial Matters

Arraignment

CrimPR 3.24, Arraigning the defendant on the indictment

(1) In order to take the defendant’s plea, the Crown Court must

(a) obtain the prosecutor’s confirmation, in writing or orally—

(i) that the indictment (or draft indictment, as the case may be) sets out a statement of each offence that the prosecutor wants the court to try and such particulars of the conduct constituting the commission of each such offence as the prosecutor relies upon to make clear what is alleged, and

(ii) of the order in which the prosecutor wants the defendants’ names to be listed in the indictment, if the prosecutor proposes that more than one defendant should be tried at the same time;

(b) ensure that the defendant is correctly identified by the indictment or draft indictment;

(c) in respect of each count—

(i) read the count aloud to the defendant, or arrange for it to be read aloud or placed before the defendant in writing,

(ii) ask whether the defendant pleads guilty or not guilty to the offence charged by that count, and

(iii) take the defendant’s plea.

(2) Where a count is read which is substantially the same as one already read aloud, then only the materially different details need be read aloud.

(3) Where a count is placed before the defendant in writing, the court must summarise its gist aloud.

(4) In respect of each count in the indictment

(a) if the defendant declines to enter a plea, the court must treat that as a not guilty plea unless rule 25.10 applies (Defendant unfit to plead);

(b) if the defendant pleads not guilty to the offence charged by that count but guilty to another offence of which the court could convict on that count

(i) if the prosecutor and the court accept that plea, the court must treat the plea as one of guilty of that other offence, but

(ii) otherwise, the court must treat the plea as one of not guilty;

(c) if the defendant pleads a previous acquittal or conviction of the offence charged by that count—

(i) the defendant must identify that acquittal or conviction in writing, explaining the basis of that plea, and

(ii) the court must exercise its power to decide whether that plea disposes of that count.

(5) In a case in which a magistrates’ court sends the defendant for trial, the Crown Court must take the defendant’s plea

(a) not less than 2 weeks (14 days) after the date on which that sending takes place, unless the parties otherwise agree; and

(b) not more than 16 weeks after that date, unless the court otherwise directs (either before or after that period expires).

FITNESS TO PLEAD

  • If accused is found fit to plead before calling of any prosecution evidence --> he will thereafter be arraigned in the usual way and plead to the indictment.

  • If D is ‘unfit to plead’ (mentally incapable) no plea will be taken.

    • However, if before prosecution evidence is called, his mental disability improves and is found fit to plead he will be arraigned in the usual way.

  • Crim Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964, s4:

    • (1) Section applies when, on the trial of a person, the question arises whether the accused is under a ‘disability’ (such disability as would constitute a bar to his being tried).

    • (2) If court thinks expedient & in interests of justice court may postpone consideration of question of fitness, to be tried until any time up to the opening of the defence case.

    • (3) If the jury return a verdict of acquittal before the question of fitness to be tried falls to be determined: that question shall not be determined.

    • (4) Subject to (2) and (3), The question of fitness to be tried shall be determined as soon as it arises

    • (5) the question of fitness shall be determined by the court, without a jury.

    • (6) the written/oral evidence of 2+ registered medical practitioners (at least one of whom is duly approved) is needed for court to make a determination as to fitness.

  • Where it is determined by a court that the accused is unfit to plead (under a disability) court will hold a trial for the jury to determine whether the accused did the AR (but not the MR) (s4A):

    • Where the accused is unfit to plead:

    • The trial shall not proceed, or further proceed.

    • The jury will determine whether they are satisfied that the accused did the act/omission charged against him as the offence (on each count(s) on which accused was being tried):

      • (a) on the evidence (if any) already given in the trial; and

      • (b) on such evidence as may be adduced or further adduced by prosecution;

      • or adduced by a person appointed by court to put the case for the defence

  • If jury are not satisfied that the D did the act/omission (the AR) they will return a verdict of acquittal (as if the count had proceeded in trial to a conclusion).

  • Where the question of disability was determined after arraignment: the determination re whether D did the act/omission, is to be made by the same jury by whom he was being tried.

  • S5: where jury finds that an accused, who is unfit to plead (i.e. under a disability) did the act/omission (the AR) charged against him [[OR where a special verdict is return that D is not guilty by reason of insanity]]: The court may make one of the following orders:

    • (a) a hospital order (for admission to such hospital as SOS specifies; such an order may be attached with a restriction order).

    • (b) a supervision order; OR

    • (c) an order for absolute discharge

    • Where the offence is one where the sentenced is fixed by law, and the court has power to make a hospital order the court shall make a hospital order with a restriction order.

  • These are the only orders a judge can make, following a finding that an accused who was unfit to plead had committed the act.

  • Before the court can make a supervision order, it must have evidence that the necessary arrangements for supervision are in place, and that such supervision is available.

PROCEDURE FOR ARRAIGNMENT (when D is found fit to plead)

  • Usually, at the commencement of PTPH (or at an earlier pre-trial hearing, see below)

  • the court clerk reads...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our BPTC Criminal Litigation Notes.

More BPTC Criminal Litigation Samples