This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

BPTC Law Notes BPTC Criminal Litigation Notes

Special Measures Notes

Updated Special Measures Notes

BPTC Criminal Litigation Notes

BPTC Criminal Litigation

Approximately 1169 pages

A collection of the best BPTC notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find after combing through dozens of samples from outstanding students with the highest results in England and carefully evaluating each on accuracy, formatting, logical structure, spelling/grammar, conciseness and "wow-factor".

In short, these are what we believe to be the strongest set of BPTC notes available in the UK this year. This collection of BPTC notes is fully updated for recent exams, ...

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our BPTC Criminal Litigation Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

SPECIAL MEASURES

SPECIAL MEASURES (ss16 - 33 YJCEA 1999)

  • eligibility overview

    • automatically eligible (unless opt out)

      • all Ws under 18 (except Ds)

        • can be dis-applied if special measures unlikely to maximise quality of evidence

        • child can opt out, provided would not diminish quality of evidence

        • general rule: video EIC + live link evidence

      • adult Cs of sex offences / offences of trafficking for exploitation

      • any W in case involving homicide / offence involving firearm or knife

    • NOT automatically eligible (must apply)

      • vulnerable Ws affected by mental physical impairment (YJCEA s16(2))

        • applicant must:

          • provide court with material establishing W:

  1. has 'disorder / disability of the mind; (MHA 1983); OR

  2. has significant impairment of intelligence + social functioning; OR

  3. has physical disability / disorder

    • satisfy court quality of evidence would be diminished by W's condition

    • court will consider W's wishes

    • Ws in fear / distress in connection with testifying (YJCEA s17(1))

      • court must

        • be satisfied qualify of evidence would be diminished by fear / distress, taking into account some / all following factors:

  1. nature + circumstances of offence

  2. W's age

  3. if relevant, socio-cultural background, ethnicity, domestic + employment circumstances, religious beliefs, political opinions

  4. behaviour towards W by D, D's family / associates, other person likely to be D or W

    • take into account W's views

    • application must give details of grounds + attach supporting evidence

    • may hold voir dire to determined eligibility

    • Ds under 18

  • available measures

  1. screening W from D (YJCEA 1999 s23)

  2. evidence by live link (YJCEA 1999 s24)

    • Ws other than D (s51 CJA)

      • live link = CCTV link / any tech with that effect e.g. internet, video conference

      • direction can be given if in interests of efficient or effective admin of justice (s51(4) CJA 2003) - in deciding court must consider:

        1. availability of W

        2. need for W to attend in person

        3. importance of W's evidence to proceedings

        4. views of W

        5. suitability of facilities from where W will give evidence

        6. whether direction might inhibit party from effectively testing W's evidence (s51(6), (7))

      • judge can direct jury 'as thinks necessary to ensure jury gives same weight to evidence' as if it had been given live (s54 CJA 2003)

    • the D (s33A YCJEA)

      • court - on application by D - may direct D's evidence to be given via live link

      • live link = any tech that enables D to see and hear a person in court room AND to be seen and heard by the jury (if is one), any co-D, legal reps, interpreter + any person appointed by court to assist D

      • direction can be given if:

    1. in interests of justice

-----AND-----

  1. either:

  1. if D under 18:

    • ability to participate effectively as W giving oral evidence is compromised by his 'level of intellectual ability or social functioning'; and

    • giving evidence by live link would allow him to participate more effectively as W, whether by improving quality of evidence or otherwise (s33A(4))

------OR------

  1. if D 18+:

    • unable to participate effectively in proceedings as W giving oral evidence because has a mental disorder (under MHA 1983 OR a 'significant impairment of intelligence and social function'; and

    • giving evidence by live link would allow him to participate more effectively as W, whether by improving quality of evidence or otherwise (s33A(5))

  1. order removal of wigs + gowns whilst W gives evidence (YJCEA 1999 s26)

  2. giving evidence in private (sex cases / cases where fear W being intimidated) (YJCEA 1999 s25)

  3. video recording of EIC (YJCEA 1999 s27)

  4. video recording of XX an re-X where EIC also recorded (YJCEA 1999 s28)

  5. examination through an intermediary (young / incapacitated W) (YJCEA 1999 s29)

    • function = communicate:

  1. to W, Qs put to W

  2. to persons asking Qs to W, W's...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our BPTC Criminal Litigation Notes.

More BPTC Criminal Litigation Samples