Interests in Land
Legal Interests
- Preliminary issues:
does grantor have legal capacity? (e.g. not owner of equitable lease).
does interest have legal capacity? s1(2) LPA 1925: (a) easements/profits for freehold/leasehold period (if not specified: assumed same period as grantor’s estate); (b) rentcharge; (c) charge by way of legal mortgage; (d) similar charge; (e) landlord’s right of entry.
- Creation formalities:
1. deed (s52(1) LPA 1925)
2. registration:
registered land – any express grant (s27(2) LRA 2002: transfer of legal estate; 7+ year legal lease; expressly granted legal easement, legal charge);
unregistered land – mortgage (s4(1)(g) LRA 2002).
- Transfer formalities:
assignment: deed (s52(1) LPA 1925).
if failed could be equitable interest (estate contract) if s2 LP(MP)A 1989 compliant.
conveyance: transfer of interests implied (s62 LPA 1925) unless contrary intent expressed (s62(4)).
remedy if infringed: damages by right + equitable remedies at court’s discretion.
Equitable interests
- Types of equitable interest:
1. inherently equitable (s1(3) LPA 1925: any interest not in s1(2) LPA 1925): e.g. restrictive covenant, estate contract (inc. option + right of pre-emption [s115 LRA: interest from time created]); beneficial interest under trust (express declaration: s53(1)(b) LPA 1925 formalities), easement for uncertain period.
2. granted by holder of equitable estate.
3. failed legal interest (Walsh v Lonsdale: failed deed estate contract if s2 LP(MP)A compliant + capable of specific performance): e.g. equitable easement (no deed/registration); equitable mortgage/charge (no deed/registration); equitable lease (only contract/no deed/registration).
- Creation formalities:
1. inherently equitable: s53(1)(a) LPA 1925: in writing, signed by grantor.
(express trust of land: s53(1)(b) LPA 1925: evidenced in writing signed by settlor).
2. estate contracts: s2 LP(MP)A 1989: in writing, all express terms, signed by both parties.
(+ must be capable of specific performance: clean hands etc.)
inc. failed legal interests (Walsh v Lonsdale).
options to purchase: original grant (Spiro v Glencrown Properties).
right of pre-emption (Bircham & Co v Worrell Holding; s115 LRA 2002: interest from time granted.).
NOT oral agreements to exchange (Sharif v Sadiq) invalid.
EXCEPTIONS: no writing needed – implied trusts (s53(2) LPA 1925 + s2(5) LP(MP)A 1989); proprietary estoppel: reliance to detriment (Gillett v Holt).
- Transfer formalities:
s53(1)(c) LPA 1925: in writing, signed by grantor or authorised agent.
contract to transfer: s2 LP(MP)A 1989.
conveyance: transfer of interests implied (s62 LPA 1925).
remedy if infringed: only equitable remedies, at court’s discretion (clean hands: Coatsworth v Johnson; although only not if breach gross + wilful – Porter v Taswell).
Licence: (if no legal or equitable interest) – mere personal right, revocable at will, will not bind 3rd parties.
Enforcement of 3rd party interests against a purchaser
[Structure:
1. identify interest.
2. set out formalities (for creation + protection).
3. apply (+ consider different possibilities)].
Registered Land
- 1. registrable dispositions (s27(2) LRA 2002: created by registration): +7yr legal lease, expressly granted legal easement, legal charge, right of entry.
registered: notice entered on charges register by registrar (s38 LRA 2002) binding.
not registered: possibly equitable, if valid contract capable of specific performance.
- 2. interests protected by notice in charges section of register (s32 LRA 2002): estate contract (option to purchase, right of pre-emption, equitable lease), equitable easement, restrictive covenant, FLA 1996 right.
notice entered: binding (s29(2) LRA 2002)
(FLA right: no vacant possession until cancelled by Family Law Courts – s33 FLA 1996).
notice not entered: not binding against purchaser for valuable consideration (s29(1) LRA 2002).
even if buyer has notice (De Lusignan v Johnson).
unless overriding: Sch 3 para 2: actual occupation (but s31 FLA 1996: FLA right cannot be overriding).
exception: fraud (Lyus v Prowsa).
- 3. interests under a trust: protected by restriction on proprietorship section of register (s40 LRA 2002).
overreached: will not bind purchaser (equitable interest transferred to purchase monies).
conveyance by 2+ trustees or trust corp. (s2(1)(ii) LPA 1925).
payment to 2+ trustees or trust corp. (s27 LPA 1927).
City of London BS v Flegg: overreaching overriding interest (e.g. occupation etc.) defeated.
not overreached: binding if overriding interest under Sch 3 para 2.
payment to 1 trustee not overreached (Williams & Glyn’s Bank Ltd v Boland).
- 4. overriding interests: bind even though not registered (s29(2) LRA 2002).
1. Sch 3 para 1: legal leases 7/- yr.
2. Sch 3 para 3: implied legal easement – if: a. known to purchaser; b. obvious on reasonable inspection; c. used within 1 year.
3. Sch 3 para 2: any interest of person in actual occupation – if: a. apparent on reasonable inspection; b. known to purchaser; + no failure to disclose when asked by interest holder.
AO at date of completion (Abbey National v Cann).
actual occupation: q. of fact + degree.
temporary absence irrelevant (Chhokar v Chhokar: hospital; Link Lending v Bustard: furniture + visits + bills)
long absence = no AO (Stockholm Finance v Garden Holdings:...
Ambitious and intelligent students
choose Oxbridge Notes.
©2024 Oxbridge Notes. All right reserved.