Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Identifying Contractual Terms Notes

Law Notes > Contract Law Notes

This is an extract of our Identifying Contractual Terms document, which we sell as part of our Contract Law Notes collection written by the top tier of Oxford students.

The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Contract Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

What are terms?
Question to ask = does the assurance given amount to an undertaking inside the contract? A =
Yes if assurance is contained in....

Express Terms o These are terms explicitly agreed by the parties o Which can be either written or oral
? You're more likely to be able to enforce written contracts though o Parole Evidence Rule
? General rule = documents which purport to record a parties' agreement are sacred and no evidence can be brought to disprove or vary it.

However, are a number of exceptions..... o Where undue influence/duress/mistake/non es factum o Contract includes terms additional to those contained in document
? Whether express (collateral) or implied o Words of document do not accurately record parties' agreement (owing to mistake/fraud)
? Chen Wishart: so the rule is basically an easily rebuttable presumption....


Collateral Terms and/or Collateral Contracts o In principle, a term or even a contract can be found which is collateral to the main terms
? Which add to
? Vary
? Contradict

The terms of the contractual document o Things which can be collateral terms:
? D's verbal/written assurance

Must have induced C to consent to contractual document o Not enough that this was a cause of C entering the contract
? C needs to show that but for that term, C would not have contracted at all.
? Signed Documents
? Notices
? References o Functions of collateral terms/contracts:
? Circumvent parole evidence rule
? Confer remedial advantages of an action for breach over misrepresentation

Means C can get his expectation rather than his reliance if he prefers in damages
? Override the Privity Rule

Shanklin Pier Ltd v Detel Products Ltd [1951]: o D told S that its paint was suitable for painting S' pier and would last X years. S instructed contractor to but D's paint - turned out to be less durable.
? S still managed to sue D on collateral contract despite not buying the paint

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Contract Law Notes.

More Contract Law Samples