Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.


Identifying Contractual Terms Notes

Law Notes > Contract Law Notes

Updates Available  

A more recent version of these Identifying Contractual Terms notes – written by Oxford students – is available here.

The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Contract Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

What are terms?
Question to ask = does the assurance given amount to an undertaking inside the contract? A =
Yes if assurance is contained in....

Express Terms o These are terms explicitly agreed by the parties o Which can be either written or oral
? You're more likely to be able to enforce written contracts though o Parole Evidence Rule
? General rule = documents which purport to record a parties' agreement are sacred and no evidence can be brought to disprove or vary it.

However, are a number of exceptions..... o Where undue influence/duress/mistake/non es factum o Contract includes terms additional to those contained in document
? Whether express (collateral) or implied o Words of document do not accurately record parties' agreement (owing to mistake/fraud)
? Chen Wishart: so the rule is basically an easily rebuttable presumption....


Collateral Terms and/or Collateral Contracts o In principle, a term or even a contract can be found which is collateral to the main terms
? Which add to
? Vary
? Contradict

The terms of the contractual document o Things which can be collateral terms:
? D's verbal/written assurance

Must have induced C to consent to contractual document o Not enough that this was a cause of C entering the contract
? C needs to show that but for that term, C would not have contracted at all.
? Signed Documents
? Notices
? References o Functions of collateral terms/contracts:
? Circumvent parole evidence rule
? Confer remedial advantages of an action for breach over misrepresentation

Means C can get his expectation rather than his reliance if he prefers in damages
? Override the Privity Rule

Shanklin Pier Ltd v Detel Products Ltd [1951]: o D told S that its paint was suitable for painting S' pier and would last X years. S instructed contractor to but D's paint - turned out to be less durable.
? S still managed to sue D on collateral contract despite not buying the paint

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Contract Law Notes.

More Contract Law Samples