Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Misrepresentation Notes

Law Notes > Contract Law Notes

This is an extract of our Misrepresentation document, which we sell as part of our Contract Law Notes collection written by the top tier of Oxford students.

The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Contract Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

*

*

*

*

*

Misrepresentation No general duty of disclosure during negotiation
= But duty not to make false statements of fact/law to induce the other party into contracting Induces the party to contract but isn't a term of contract ? not a mere promise/ contractual term Distinguish: (i) Term - parties intended for it to be a term (i.e. to provide warranty/guarantee/promise as to statement's accuracy (Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams; Dick Bentley Productions v Harold Smith) (ii) Promise -an undertaking to do/not to do something creating an expectation protected by law (iii) Representation -asserts existence of a given state of affairs, either true or false + invites reliance w/out constituting an undertaking to bring about that state of affairs Requirements 1) unambiguous 2) false 3) statement
? some positive conduct (written, oral etc.)
? silence is insufficient (With v O'Flanagan) nor mere failure to disclose 4) of existing fact or law
? NOT if: i) mere puff - statement that's too vague
? the more specific, the less likely to be a mere puff ii) honestly held statement of opinion/belief which proves to be unfounded ( Bisset v Wilkinson) a. where representor has greater knowledge/special skill, court will imply that representation must be made w/reasonable care & skill(Esso Petroleum v Mardon) b. facts are known to both parties = what one says to another is often merely expression of opinion iii) astatement of intent? unless D misstates his present intention ( Edgington v Fitzmaurice)
? But courts are flexible in defining a 'statement'? can be made by conduct or words 5) addressed to the party misled
? by direct communication
? by communication to TPw/intent to be passed on to C 6) which induced C to enter into contract
? doesn't have to besole inducement?actively present in representee's mind (Edgington v Fitzmaurice)
? Ccan't show inducement where he was: a. unaware of representation b. knew it wasn'ttrue c. didn't allow it to affect his judgment d. placed reliance on TP when entering into contract e. D corrected him & drew attn. to correction prior to any reliance
? not sufficient that C could have discovered the truth ? he must have actually discovered it!
7) ... and was material (possibly)
? meaning unclear?statement which would affectthe judgment of reasonable man on whether to contract on those terms Types
? All entitle representee to rescind but not all give rise to action for damages!!
1) Fraudulent = rescission +tort of deceit (Derry v Peek) i) proof of fraud?false representation made either:

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Contract Law Notes.

More Contract Law Samples