This is an extract of our Reform Of Covenants document, which we sell as part of our Land Law Notes collection written by the top tier of Oxford students.
The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Land Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:
Law Commission CP 108 (2008): Reform of Covenants Reform History - suggestions for reform over the years
Number of options have been considered over the years for the reform of covenants: o Wilberforce Committee:
? Problem identified that the burden of positive covenants, as opposed to the benefit =
Positive Covenants cannot run with the land o Other devices trying to circumvent this restriction =
? Proposed to allow positive covenants benefits AND burdens run with the land
And that Lands Tribunal have ability to discharge or modify positive covenants o Law Com 1967:
? Two problems identified with restrictive covenants:
Enforceability of particular covenants often in doubt
Procedure for discharge and modification inadequate
Creation of "land obligation" created by specified land over other specified land o Thus meaning benefit and burden would run automatically with the land o More akin to easements than covenants
? To address this problem, amend s84 of LPA 1925 so that Lands Tribunal have greater powers to modify or discharge obligations. Case for Reform: 2008
Restrictive Covenants o Law Com: keep restrictive covenants b/c still useful
? Reform will cure of defects
? Planning Law is wide but still need private restrictive covenants b/c:
Restrictive covenants cater for private individuals for purposes which planning law doesn't help
Planning Law can't deal with restrictive covenants as unrealistic to expect planning authorities to concern self with detailed matters for which restrictive covenants now make provision
Certain changes of use which neighbour might reasonably object to don't require planning permission
Only planning authorities can enforce planning controls - restrictive covenants needed to allow private individuals to enforce instead.
? Abolition would lead to Land arbitrarily changing value overnight b/c some rights that were enforceable would no longer be enforceable
? Preventing freehold covenants will lead to people using leasehold instead where still available - for better or worse. o Defects of restrictive covenants
? Identifying who holds the benefit
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Land Law Notes.