GDL Law Notes GDL EU Law Notes
A collection of the best GDL notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find after combing through applications from top students and carefully evaluating each on accuracy, formatting, logical structure, spelling/grammar, conciseness and "wow-factor". In short these are what we believe to be the strongest set of GDL notes available in the UK this year. This collection of GDL notes is fully updated for recent exams, also making them the most up-to-date GDL study materials ...
The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our GDL EU Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:
Competition Commission = Watchdog
Aims:
1) Competitive market economy
2) Prevent barriers to the integration of the single, internal market
Free movement of goods/competition law are two sides of the same coin
REGULATION 1/2003 – THE MODERNISATION REGULATION
Changes to competition law – authority to apply A101 TFEU is devolved from the Commission to the National Competition Authorities (NCAs) – e.g. Office of Fair Trading in UK
Together the Commission and NCAs create the Competition Network
Regulation: parties to agreements/decisions must themselves decide if it infringes 101/102
Power to apply 101/102 in hands of the Competition network
National courts may also apply 101/102 directly and deal with appeals
Fines have been revised upwards:
Multiplier system and increased fines for companies who refuse to supply info (SGL v Commission)
Elevators and Escalators Cartel: record fine imposed for bid rigging, price fixing, market sharing and exchange of info
Dutch company Otis received 100% immunity as a whistle-blower
ThyssenKrupp received a 50% increased fine as a repeat offender
Synthetic Rubber Cartel: Bayer got 100% immunity despite being a repeat offender, Dow received 40% reduction for cooperation and Shell received 50% increase as repeat offender
Alternatives to fines being investigated: allowing out of court settlement in return for immediate cartel cessation; encouraging private actions by cartel victims (Escalator), criminal sanctions as in US
ARTICLE 101 TFEU
To protect the normal, competitive working of the single market by prohibiting all agreements btw undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices which may affect trade btw MSs and which have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition
‘Undertakings’: broadly defined: includes any natural/legal person engaged in some form of economic/commercial activity – any entity regardless of the legal status/how it is financed (Hofner & Else) – even without profit motive
Distribution of Package Tours During the 1990 World Cup : FIFA/Italian FA were undertakings under A101
MOTOE V Elliniko Domosio (A102): ELPA amounted to undertaking as engaged in economic activity despite not for profit and irrespective of its legal form
General Structure of Article: divided into 3 paragraphs:
Article 101(1): rule vs. anti-competitive agreements, decisions and concerted practices
Drafted so widely that it could capture almost all contracts – need to balance the article with 101(3)
Key distinction is btw non-collusive (lawful) and collusive (unlawful) behaviour – doesn’t really matter what type of collusion: Commission v ANIC – unlawful agreement and concerted practice
Width of interpretation – AC Treuhand AG v Commission: enough that there was a sufficiently definite causal link btw activity and restriction of competition
Agreements
Wide interpretation of ‘agreement’ – Tepea – interpreted to include informal agreements/expressions of intention (Hercules Chemicals)
Usually has to be btw at least two undertakings – not just one (Bayer AG)
Decisions by associations of undertakings
Mainly concerns trade associations – includes non-binding recommendations – Verenining - necessary to consider whether members tend to comply with recommendations
Some recommendations relate to pricing, market strategies or market-related information
ANSEAU/NAVEWA: trade association involved with supply of washing machines – association provided that such goods could only be distributed under common label = breach
Concerted Practices
Designed to catch forms of co-op which aren’t formal oral/written agreement or decision
Co-ordinated/parallel behaviour
Defined in Dyestuffs – ‘a form of coordination’ before agreement concluded – will look for evidence of meetings btw companies/identical or similar actions: parallel pricing strategies – CJ – not automatically concerted practices –but may be evidence of them – in this case there was
E.g. of conduct not amounting to concerted practices – Ahlstron – ‘Wood Pulp Cartel’ Case – parallel pricing found to be normal feature of the market
Article 101(2): legal effect of the prohibition – any agreement in breach of A101(1) is automatically void – this article has retroactive effect
Article 101(3): provides that A101(1) can be declared inapplicable if the agreement has pro-competitive effects – e.g. Societe Technique Miniere
Effect on trade btw MS
Set out in STM case – ‘possible to foresee a sufficient degree of probability’ that there will be an influence – mere potential to affect trade sufficient and even if undertaking operates in only one MS
Effect may be increase or decrease in trade (Consten SARL) or a franchise agreement (Pronuptia) or a trade association (Vereninging)
‘trade’ – wide meaning
Agreements include the effect of a number of smaller agreements
Brasserie de Haecht SA v Wilkin Janssen – agreement btw Belgian brewery and a small no. of pubs in Belgium – provided that the pubs would obtain supplied from the brewery exclusively – could affect MS even though just in Belgium – cumulative effect would close Belgium market to foreign importers – since this decision – Notice on Agreements of Minor Importance – principle stays the same but if parties have less than 10-15% sharewould be de minimis
Consten – deal to be exclusive dealer in Grundig’s products in France if it agreed not to handle competing products – protection of French market from imports – in breach – reintroducing national partitioning
A101(1) Prohibits Agreements which have Object or effect of prevention, restriction or distortion of competition
Non-exhaustive list of prohibited restrictions (“the black list”) – ‘hardcore’ items
Applicable to horizontal and vertical agreements
Horizontal: e.g. ICI Polypropylene cases – prices rises agreed by producers all at same level of industry
Vertical: United Brands Co – network of vertical agreements...
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our GDL EU Law Notes.
A collection of the best GDL notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find after combing through applications from top students and carefully evaluating each on accuracy, formatting, logical structure, spelling/grammar, conciseness and "wow-factor". In short these are what we believe to be the strongest set of GDL notes available in the UK this year. This collection of GDL notes is fully updated for recent exams, also making them the most up-to-date GDL study materials ...
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get Started