This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more

GDL Law Notes GDL EU Law Notes

Free Movement Of Goods Notes

Updated Free Movement Of Goods Notes

GDL EU Law Notes

GDL EU Law

Approximately 409 pages

A collection of the best GDL notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find after combing through applications from top students and carefully evaluating each on accuracy, formatting, logical structure, spelling/grammar, conciseness and "wow-factor". In short these are what we believe to be the strongest set of GDL notes available in the UK this year. This collection of GDL notes is fully updated for recent exams, also making them the most up-to-date GDL study materials ...

The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our GDL EU Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Free Movement of Goods

_______________________________________________________

The Internal Market

Treaty Basis

Art 3 TEU

  • 3(1): Union’s aims of peace & wellbeing for its people

  • 3(2): an area of ‘freedom, security and justice without internal frontiers’

  • 3(3): ‘the Union shall stablish an internal market’:

    • ‘It shall work for the sustainable development of Europe based on balanced economic growth and price stability,

    • ‘a highly competitive social market economy,’

    • ‘aiming at full employment and social progress,’

    • ‘and a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment. ‘

    • ‘It shall promote scientific and technological advance.’

  • One of the most basic integration mechanisms is a market. A customs union is a more advanced structure of integration, with internal policies and customs for foreign trade. An internal market is the most sophisticated form, with internal & external laws.

Art 26 TFEU

  • Competence to adopt measures to establish the internal market - the Union’s institutions will actually intervene & introduce conditions which will lead to an internal market. Not just the removal of obstacles, but positive intervention.

Art 27 TFEU

  • ‘Commission shall take into account the extent of the effort that certain economies showing differences in development will have to sustain for the establishment of the internal market and it may propose appropriate provisions.’

Art 28 TFEU

  • Customs union applying to products from MS & third countries

Art 29 (ex Article 24 EC)

  • Free circulation of products after import formalities

    • Once a product has been imported from a 3rd country to a MS, and has been subject to customs & trade rules in that MS, it is assimilated to domestic products

  • It doesn’t make a difference whether it was produced here or another country

Art 30 TFEU (ex Article 25 EC)

  • ‘Customs duties on imports and exports and charges having equivalent effect shall be prohibited between Member States. This prohibition shall also apply to customs duties of a fiscal nature.’

Art31 TFEU (ex Article 26 EC)

  • ‘Common Customs Tariff duties shall be fixed by the Council on a proposal from the Commission.’

Art 32 TFEU (ex Article 27 EC)

  • Guiding aims for the Commission:

    • Promoting trade

    • Developing competition

    • Supply of raw materials & semi-finished goods – avoiding distorting conditions of competition in this regard

    • Avoiding serious disturbances in MS economies

Harmonisation of the Market

Emerging themes:

  • Incremental, evolving set of principles: going from broad to narrow to broad

  • Drastic principles of Dassonville & Cassis de Dijon (below) must be seen in their political contexts: the Commission was finding it very hard to adopt legislation (and when they were successful it was adopted on the lowest common denominator), so the CoJ took it upon itself to implement EU objectives

  • Deregulatory measures (creation of competition): by being forced to accept other MS’s standards, the market is being deregulated

  • The role of national courts: the CoJ is viewed as deeply political and there can be conflict, however there is often complicity between the domestic & EU courts through preliminary references

  • Limited trade freedom: Art 36, for instance, defines that it is permissible to restrict free movement to protect a non-economic interest. Note also the inventions of CoJ - mandatory requirements

This is negative harmonization i.e. national rules have been harmonized by removing obstacles. It works from the bottom up; on an ad hoc basis with the CoJ gradually removing restrictions.

Positive harmonization is not from the CoJ but from the legislature. It is from the top down. The implementation of one set of rules which stretches throughout the EU would get rid of the need for mutual recognition. However this is a bold political move (especially considering the EU’s tumultuous present condition):

  • This is both deregulatory and reregulatory: it removes 28 legal structures, but replaces them with one

  • In order for it to work, it requires the Union to pick and choose regulations worthy of protection and make sweeping legislative changes that may affect different national environments differently

  • Two practical difficulties:

    • Substantive limitations: the Union may only adopt measures in an area where they have competence

    • Procedural constraints: how to implement measures & at what standard? QMV? Normal legislative procedure? At present our textual basis in Art 115 TFEU gives the Union power to harmonise the free market unanimously

  • Robert Schuman, 9 May 1950:“Europe will not be made all at once, or according to a single plan. It will be built through concrete achievements which first create a de facto solidarity. The coming together of the nations of Europe requires the elimination of the age of old opposition of France and Germany…The pooling of coal and steel production should immediately provide for the setting up of common foundations for economic development as a first step in the federation of Europe. … The solidarity in production thus established will make it plain that war between France and Germany becomes not merely unthinkable, but materially impossible’.

  • COM (86) 310 final, Commission White Paper on the Internal Market, “The reason for getting rid entirely of physical and other controls between Member States is not one of theology or appearance, but the hard practical fact that maintenance of any internal frontier controls will perpetuate the costs and disadvantages of a divided market.’

Art 114 TFEU (ex Article 95 TEC)

  • Competence for EP & Council to adopt measures in order to establish the internal market using the ordinary legislative procedure

  • This uses the ordinary legislative procedure via QMV - they have the competence to establish the internal market

    • Para 1: most fundamental change as this makes it much easier

    • Para 2: exceptions remain in the competence of Art 115 (unanimity), as these are the most sensitive...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our GDL EU Law Notes.