Free Movement Of Workers Notes

GDL Law Notes > GDL EU Law Notes

This is an extract of our Free Movement Of Workers document, which we sell as part of our GDL EU Law Notes collection written by the top tier of Cambridge/Bpp/College Of Law students.

The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our GDL EU Law Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

Revision: EU

[FREE MOVEMENT OF WORKERS/PERSONS]
Article 7A SEA 1986: aimed for elimination of all border controls - opposition from UK/Ireland To whom does 'free movement' apply?

*

Directive 2004/38 came into force 2006: right to move to all EU Citizens - workers/selfemploy/retired/students

*

1992: concept of citizenship introduced by Maastricht revision of EC Treaty: A17 - now A20 TFEU

A21(1) TFEU: 'Every citizen of the Union should have the right to move freely'Directive 2004/38: shift from economic to social: restricts MS ability to refuse citizenship

Free movement of workersOne of the 4 essential freedoms on the EU internal market - A3(2) TOTEUA26 TFEU - internal market = area w/o internal frontiers - free movement of goods, persons etc.A18 -principle of non-discrimination on the basis of nationality

A45 TFEU: Key Provision relating to workers Key Secondary Legislation

1. Regulation 492/2011: right of equal treatment, residence and specific rights enjoyed by workers/family - consolidated and replaced by regulation 1612/68 + 2 others

2. Directive 2004/38: rights of entry/residence - applies to all individuals holding MS nationality

3. Directive 2005/26 - recognition of professional qualifications - streamlined 15 directives Definition of a "worker"Remain longer than 3 months - must show not economic burden (economically active/sufficient resources)

*

Worker: No definition in EC treaty - CJ - will be defined by national law but given a union meaning

Hoekstra (nee Unger) v Besturr der Bedrifsvereniging - CJ held it had ultimate authority to define worker

An employment relationship: Lawrie-Blum - 3 essential characteristics: trainee teacher fulfilled all 3 a) Perform services b) For and under direction of another, and c) In return for remuneration An effective and genuine activity - excludes marginal contributions - Levin v Staatssecretaris van Justitie : part time

*

Kempf v Staatssecretaris van Justitie: economic activity cannot be excluded even if insufficient to meet needs

What constitutes economic activity?
Lawrie Blum: providing services - trainee teacher Walgrave & Koch - pacer in cycling race Union Royal Belge des Societes de Football Association ASBL v Jean Marc Bosman: professional sports counts 1

Revision: EU

[FREE MOVEMENT OF WORKERS/PERSONS]

*

Steymann v Staatssecretaris: member of religious community - plumbing etc. = genuine economic activity

*

Bettray v Staatsecretaris van Justitie: compulsory drug rehabilitation - work was not genuine economic activity

Job Seekers: A45 only refers to those who have secured work - but CJ has extended this to those seeking work

*

Procurereur du Roi v Royer: job seekers granted rights of entry/residence for a period before lawful deportation

*

R v Immigration Tribunal, ex parte Antoissen: CJ held that a person is entitled to remain beyond and period stipulated in national legislation if able to show they are economically active, making a genuine effort to find or work or had realistic prospect of obtaining it

Unlike workers - JS have no entitlement to social benefits pending commencement of work: Antonissen confirmed limitations on benefits for those unable to find work

*

Regulation 1408/71 and 2001/83 - payment of unemployment benefits for up to 3 months but not after this

*

Regulation 492/2011: JS not able to claim other benefits available to a person with a job

*

Collins v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: right to restrict social benefits granted to host JS

What can workers bring with them? Definition of family members in D2004/38 - A2(2)

*

Extension to include registered partners and partner's descendents and ascendants : taking into account Reed - but only a handful of MS recognise registered partnerships - only acquire rights which are granted in home/host

*

"beneficiaries" under A3: includes members outside A2(2) who are dependants/members of the household/whose health problems require care of such a person or the partner with whom EU citizen has 'durable relationship, duly attested'

*

"Dependant" in Jia v Migrationiverket - in need of 'material support in order to meet their essential needs'

*

Reed: Cohabitees/un-married partners - A7(2) because Dutch law allowed nationals to live with nonnational, non-martial partners

Divorce/SeparationRights remain unaffected - Diatta v land Berlin - Senegalese national + French spouse in GermanyBut contrast with R v Secretary for State, ex parte Sandhu: Indian national married German living in UK - Sandhu no longer a qualifying spouse under EU lawDirective 2004/38 - detailed provisions:

2

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our GDL EU Law Notes.