GDL Law Notes > Cambridge/Bpp/College Of Law GDL Law Notes > GDL EU Law Notes

Freedom Of Services Notes

This is a sample of our (approximately) 4 page long Freedom Of Services notes, which we sell as part of the GDL EU Law Notes collection, a Distinction package written at Cambridge/Bpp/College Of Law in 2017 that contains (approximately) 307 pages of notes across 36 different documents.

Learn more about our GDL EU Law Notes

The original file is a 'Word (Docx)' whilst this sample is a 'PDF' representation of said file. This means that the formatting here may have errors. The original document you'll receive on purchase should have more polished formatting.

Freedom Of Services Revision

The following is a plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our GDL EU Law Notes. This text version has had its formatting removed so pay attention to its contents alone rather than its presentation. The version you download will have its original formatting intact and so will be much prettier to look at.

Revision: EU Law


A56 only makes reference to provision but CJ has made it clear that it applies to receiving services as well as provision of services

Freedom of establishment (a physical presence in another MS) is not required for A56 to be activated

Covers individuals and companies providing services

Van Binsbergen v Bestuur: confirms that A56 is directly effective: horizontally and vertically

Limitations on freedom to provide services are the same as on establishment - Article 62 TFEU

A57 says that A56 will apply where none of the other freedoms apply - 'catch all' freedom


A57 - services - 'normally provided for remuneration' : industrial, commercial, activities of craftsmen, activities of the professions: e.g. legal service, insurance + other financial services

Prostitution recognised as service in Jany and the provision of abortion in Society for the Protection of Unborn Children v Grogan - but doesn't stop MS from prohibiting the services e.g. abortion - Ireland

"Genuine and effective economic activity"

Widely interpreted: o

Deliege v Ligue Francophone: Sporting activity (Judo) at amateur level was an economic activity for purpose of A56


Her Majesty's Customs and Excise v Schindler: lotteries = an economic activity: services provided for remuneration

Provision of information will fall outside A56 unless there is a connection between the persons distributing and the provider of the services o

Grogan - distribution of information about abortion not protected as it was provided not by the clinic themselves but by students as an exercise in freedom of expression

Cross border element

Must be some cross border element - Procureur du Roi v Debauve: A56 won't apply to 'activities whose relvent elements are confined within a single MS' - but CJ has become more flexible - Deliege - sufficient that she participated in competitions in other MS 0 in de Coster v College des bourgmestre - local tax on ownership of satellite dishes breached A56 because would dissuade people from receiving programmes broadcast in other MS

Provider/Recipient of the service don't have to be in different MS: Hubbard v Hamburger: both recipient and provider in UK: but had to make claim in German court - German law was discriminatory

Rights granted 1

****************************End Of Sample*****************************

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our GDL EU Law Notes.