GDL Law Notes > Cambridge/Bpp/College Of Law GDL Law Notes > GDL EU Law Notes

Sex Discrimination Notes

This is a sample of our (approximately) 4 page long Sex Discrimination notes, which we sell as part of the GDL EU Law Notes collection, a Distinction package written at Cambridge/Bpp/College Of Law in 2017 that contains (approximately) 307 pages of notes across 36 different documents.

Learn more about our GDL EU Law Notes

The original file is a 'Word (Docx)' whilst this sample is a 'PDF' representation of said file. This means that the formatting here may have errors. The original document you'll receive on purchase should have more polished formatting.

Sex Discrimination Revision

The following is a plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our GDL EU Law Notes. This text version has had its formatting removed so pay attention to its contents alone rather than its presentation. The version you download will have its original formatting intact and so will be much prettier to look at.

Sex Discrimination Defrenne v SABENA (No 2) - objective of SD law - 'part of the social objectives of the Community' - not just economic

A157 TFEU: principle of equal pay for equal work - now extended to equal pay for equal value - A157 now incorporates broader principle of equal treatment - not just equal pay - access/conditions

Two directives - 75/117 (Equal pay for equal work) and the new 2006/54 (Equal treatment)

A157(4) : positive discrimination permitted

The meaning of "discrimination"

When principle of 'equal pay for male and female workers for equal work or work of equal value'

Directive 2006/54: same principle recognised and defines 'direct' / 'indirect' discrimination A2(a)/(b)

Indirect: Where a provision puts one sex at a disadvantages without objective justification: Rinner-Kuhn v FWW: German law excluded from sick pay workers doing no more than 10 hours were week - part-time workers likely to be more female than male - Jenkins v Kingsgate (Clothing Productions) - paying parttime workers less than full doesn't itself constitute discrimination - but only if different rates attributable to objectively justified factos

Discrimination if 2 categories of workers are paid differently for work of equal value - Enderby v Frenchay

Objective Justification

Clarified in Bilka-Kaufaus: proportionality test - objectively justified if (a) correspond to a real need of the business (b) appropriate with a view to achieving objectives pursued (c) necessary to achieve objectives

"Sex" Discrimination

P v S and Cornwall County Council: dismissal of a transsexual for reasons of gender reassignment = SD

However - Grant v SW Trains: Stable relationship required for employee travel benefits: discrimination based on sexual orientation did not constitute SD - Clarification now in Directive 2000/78 adopted under A19 TFEU - prohibition on discrimination based on sexual orientation

A157 TFEU: Equal Pay

Defrenne (No 2): A157 directly effective - but prospective only: only those who had already lodged claims

Definition of "pay": broadly defined: e.g. Garland v British Rail: special travel facilities to male employees = pay Pensions: do they constitute pay?


****************************End Of Sample*****************************

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our GDL EU Law Notes.