Someone recently bought our

students are currently browsing our notes.

X

Interfrigo Notes

BCL Law Notes > Conflict of Laws BCL Notes

This is an extract of our Interfrigo document, which we sell as part of our Conflict of Laws BCL Notes collection written by the top tier of Oxford students.

The following is a more accessble plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Conflict of Laws BCL Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:

INTERFRIGO (2009) FACTS Proceedings brought by Intercontainer Interfrigo (ICF) SC ('ICF'), a company established in Belgium, against Balkenende Oosthuizen BV ('Balkenende') and MIC Operations BV ('MIC'), two companies established in the Netherlands, seeking an order for the payment by those two companies of unpaid invoices which had been issued on the basis of a charter party entered into by the parties. QUESTIONS By the second part of its second question and the third and fourth questions, the national court in essence asks in which circumstances it is possible, under the second sentence of Article 4(1) of the Convention, to apply different national laws to the same contractual relationship, in particular as regards the limitation of the rights under a contract such as that at issue in the main proceedings. Must the exception in the second clause of Article 4(5) of the... Convention be interpreted in such a way that the presumptions in Article 4(2) [to] (4) of the... Convention do not apply only if it is evident from the circumstances in their totality that the connecting criteria indicated therein do not have any genuine connecting value, or indeed if it is clear therefrom that there is a stronger connection with some other country?
HOLDING Question 1 - Separability It is apparent from the wording of that provision that the rule providing for the severance of a contract is of an exceptional nature. In that regard, the Giuliano and Lagarde report states that the words 'by way of exception' in the last sentence of Article 4(1) 'are... to be interpreted in the sense that the court must have recourse to severance as seldom as possible'. As the Advocate General pointed out in paragraphs 83 and 84 of his Opinion, the possibility of separating a contract into a number of parts in order to make it subject to a number of laws runs counter to the objectives of the Convention and must be allowed only where there are a number of parts to the contract who may be regarded as independent of each other. Consequently, in order to determine whether a part of a contract may be made subject to a different law it is necessary to ascertain whether the object of that part is independent in relation to the purpose of the rest of the contract.

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Conflict of Laws BCL Notes.

More Conflict Of Laws Bcl Samples