The Hollandia Notes

The Hollandia (1982)

Facts

My Lords, on March 21, 1978, some nine months after the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1971 ("the Act of 1971") came into force, the respondents ("the shippers") shipped from the port of Leith a large machine weighing 9906 kilograms upon a vessel, Haico Holwerda, belonging to the appellants, the Royal Netherlands Steamship Co. ("the carriers"), for carriage to Bonaire in the Netherlands Antilles.

The shippers claim that the machine was damaged during the course of discharge from the carrying vessel at Bonaire as a result of the negligence of the servants of the carrying vessel which for the ocean leg of the voyage was in fact a ship under the Norwegian flag, the Morviken, of which the carriers were charterers.

On February 26, 1980, the shippers commenced an action in rem in the High Court against the Hollandia, a sister ship of the Haico Holwerda, belonging to the carriers. The Hollandia was within the jurisdiction of the Admiralty Court though she was not in fact arrested because, as so often happens, the carriers' solicitors agreed to accept service of the writ without prejudice to their right to move the Admiralty Court for a stay of all further proceedings.

The clause relied upon was condition 2 which was in the following terms:

Paragraph 1: "Law of application and jurisdiction. The law of the Netherlands in which the Hague Rules, as adopted by the Brussels Convention of August 25, 1924, are incorporated - with the exception of article 9 - shall apply to this contract. The maximum liability per package is D.fl. 1,250. For goods loaded or discharged at a Belgian port, the rules of article 91 of chapter 2 of the Belgian Commercial Code shall apply.

Paragraph 3: "All actions under the present contract of carriage shall be brought before the Court of Amsterdam and no other court shall have jurisdiction with regard to any such action unless the carrier appeals to another jurisdiction or voluntarily submits himself thereto."

Legal Regime applicable in Netherlands: My Lords, as is apparent from the first paragraph of the clause, the Netherlands at the time of the issue of the bill of lading were parties to the Brussels Convention of 1924, commonly known as the Hague Rules, which were scheduled to the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1924 ("the Act of 1924"); but the Netherlands had not by then ratified the Brussels Protocol of 1968 amending the Hague Rules, commonly known as the Hague-Visby Rules, which are scheduled to the Act of 1971.

Legal Regime in England: The provisions of the Act of 1971 that are most directly relevant to the instant appeal are subsections (1) to (3) of section 1 which reads as follows:

(1) In this Act, 'the Rules' means the International Convention for the unification of certain rules of law relating to bills of lading signed at Brussels on August 25, 1924, as amended by the Protocol signed at Brussels on February 23, 1968. (2) The provisions of the Rules, as set out in the Schedule to this Act, shall have the force of law. (3) Without prejudice to subsection (2) above, the said provisions shall have effect (and have the force of law) in relation to and in connection with the carriage of goods by sea in ships where the port of shipment is a port in the United Kingdom, whether or not the carriage is between ports in two different states within the meaning of article X of the Rules."

Article III of the Hague-Visby Rules:

8. Any clause, covenant, or agreement in a contract of carriage relieving the carrier or the ship from liability for loss or damage to, or in connection with, goods arising from negligence, fault, or failure in the duties and obligations provided in this article or lessening such liability otherwise than as provided in these Rules, shall be null and void and of no effect. A benefit of insurance in favour of the carrier or similar clause shall be deemed to be a clause relieving the carrier from liability.

Holding

Express Limitation of Liability – Void

The first paragraph of condition 2 of the bill of lading, prescribing as it does for a per package maximum limit of liability on the part of the carriers for loss or damage arising from negligence or breach of contract instead of the higher per kilogram maximum...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Conflict of Laws BCL Notes.