BCL Law Notes Conflict of Laws BCL Notes
These are case summaries (excerpts from cases - not paraphrased) I made during the Oxford BCL for the Conflict of Laws course. ...
The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our Conflict of Laws BCL Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:
Color Drack (2007)
Facts
Proceedings between Color Drack GmbH ('Color Drack'), a company established in Schwarzach (Austria), and Lexx International Vertriebs GmbH ('Lexx'), a company established in Nuremberg (Germany), concerning the performance of a contract for the sale of goods, under which Lexx undertook to deliver goods to various retailers of Color Drack in Austria, inter alia in the area of the registered office of Color Drack, which undertook to pay the price of those goods.
The dispute concerns in particular the non-performance of the obligation to which Lexx was subject under the contract to take back unsold goods and to reimburse the price to Color Drack.
By reason of that non-performance, on 10 May 2004 Color Drack brought an action for payment against Lexx before the Bezirksgericht St Johann im Pongau (Austria) within whose jurisdiction its registered office is located⦠The appeal court took the view that a single linking place, as provided for in the first indent of Article 5(1)(b) of Regulation No 44/2001 for all claims arising from a contract for the sale of goods, could not be determined where there were several places of delivery.
Question
Is Article 5(1)(b) of [Regulation No 44/2001] to be interpreted as meaning that a seller of goods domiciled in one Member State who, as agreed, has delivered the goods to the purchaser, domiciled in another Member State, at various places within that other Member State, can be sued by the purchaser regarding a claim under the contract relating to all the (part) deliveries - if need be, at the plaintiff's choice - before the court of one of those places (of performance)?
Holding
Only considers the question of several places of delivery within a member-state
As a preliminary point, it must be stated that the considerations that follow apply solely to the case where there are several places of delivery within a single Member State and are without prejudice to the answer to be given where there are several places of delivery in a number of Member States.
Art. 5(1)(a) and Art. 5(1)(b) were intended to override Tessili and CMC
In that regard, it is appropriate to take into consideration the origins of the provision under consideration. By that provision, the Community legislature intended, in respect of sales contracts, expressly to break with the earlier solution under which the place of performance was determined, for each of the obligations in question, in accordance with the private international rules of the court seised of the dispute. By designating autonomously as 'the place of performance' the place where the obligation which characterises the contract is to be performed, the Community legislature sought to centralise at its place of performance jurisdiction over disputes concerning all...
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our Conflict of Laws BCL Notes.
These are case summaries (excerpts from cases - not paraphrased) I made during the Oxford BCL for the Conflict of Laws course. ...
Ask questions π Get answers π It's simple ποΈπποΈ
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get Started