BPTC Law Notes BPTC Civil Ligitation Notes
A collection of the best BPTC notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find after combing through dozens of samples from outstanding students with the highest results in England and carefully evaluating each on accuracy, formatting, logical structure, spelling/grammar, conciseness and "wow-factor".
In short, these are what we believe to be the strongest set of BPTC notes available in the UK this year. This collection of BPTC notes is fully updated for recent exams, ...
The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our BPTC Civil Ligitation Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:
DISCLOSURE
The process
disclosure - parties send each other list of documents
inspection - other side can request copies of documents in list (other side usually provide photocopies)
Definitions
disclosure = stating that the document exists / had existed (r31.2)
document = anything in which info of any description is recorded, including e-documents (PD 31 para 2A.1); copy = by whatever means, directly or indirectly (r31.4)
e-document
= email, databases, documents stored on servers and back-up systems (even if deleted), metadata (PD 31 para 2A.1)
parties must discuss use of tech to manage e-doc disclosure (PD 31B para 8)
parties encouraged to seek directions for e-doc disclosure at first CMC (PD 31B para 9)
e-docs Q:
parties may exchange to provide info about scope, format etc. of e-doc disclosure
must be verified by statement of truth
DUTIES OF DISCLOSURE
Lawyers' duties
as soon as litigation contemplated, parties' legal reps must inform clients of need to preserve disclosable documents, including e-docs which might otherwise be deleted under client's data retention policy (PD 31 para 7)
must withdraw if client refuses to accept this advice (Code of Coduct para 608(d))
Clients' duties
general duty of disclosure
continues until proceedings are concluded if documents covered by duty come to party's notice at any time during proceedings must
immediately notify every other party (r31.11(1), (2)); and
prepare + serve supplemental list of documents (PD 31 para 3.3)
duty to search (see below)
sign disclosure statement (see below)
WHEN DOES DISCLOSURE TAKE PLACE?
court gives directions at first CMC OR allocation stage
DISCLOSURE
SCOPE OF DISCLOSURE
Standard disclosure
applies to: small claims, fast-track, multi-track PI, other multi track ONLY if court directs (31.5(1))
order for disclosure = order for standard disclosure (unless court directs otherwise)
The menu option
applies to multi track claims, other than those including PI (unless court orders otherwise) (r31.5(2))
STANDARD DISCLOSURE
Documents to be disclosed
party only required disclose documents which (r31.6):
he relies on in support of his affirmative case (Shah v HSBC, r31.6(a))
adversely affect his / another party's affirmative case OR support another party's affirmative case (r31.6(b)); and
he is required to disclose by a PD (r31.6(c))
PI claims: medical records back to birth (OCS v Wells)
professional negligence claims against solicitors: entirety of solicitor's original file (Martin v Triggs Turner Barton)
whether document falls within (a) - (c) judged by reference SoCs ONLY (Paddick v Ass News)
NOT a fishing expedition
NOT the same as relevance: does NOT cover documents only relevant to credibility
must be relevant to issues in case (Atos v Avis)
Documents in party's control (r31.8)
duty to disclose = limited to documents in party's control
party has control if (r31.8(2))
is / was in his physical possession; or
has / has had right to possession of it e.g. in possession of agent, medical records
-----OR------
has / has had right to inspect / take copies of it
Duty to make reasonable search (r31.7)
party must make a reasonable search for documents within meaning of standard disclosure (r31.7)
factors relevant to reasonableness
number of documents
nature + complexity of proceedings
ease + expense of retrieval
significance of documents
proportionality e.g. limit by date, place, category (r1.1(2)(c), PD 31 para 2)
unreasonable to search for document
if do not search on ground unreasonable, must state in disclosure statement + ID category / class of document (r31.7(3))
can challenge refusal to search by applying to court (Nichia Co v Argos)
Procedure (31.10)
party must make a reasonable search for documents in r31.6 (see above)
limiting standard disclosure
parties may agree in writing, lodged with court to OR court may dispense with / limit standard disclosure (r31.5(c), r31.10(8), PD 31 para 1.4)
specifically, parties can agree in writing to disclose documents WITHOUT making a list OR WITHOUT disclosing party making a disclosure statement
includes disclosure / inspection / both in stages (r31.13)
list of documents in party's control (31.10)
each party must make + serve on every other party (r31.10(2))
list must
ID documents concisely in convenient order + manner (r31.10(3))
date order
consecutively numbered
concise description
if large number, list category, not individual document (PD 31 para 3.2)
indicate:
section 1: (non-mandatory if any) documents disclosing party does NOT object to being inspected
section 2: documents party claims a right / duty to withhold inspection (including privileged documents) (r31.10(4)(a)); and
section 3: documents no longer in party's control + what has happened to them ((r31.10(4)(b))
include a disclosure statement (see (4)) by disclosing party (((r31.10(5)) / non-party if permitted by a PD (r31.10(9))
disclosure statement
= statement made by by disclosing party (((r31.10(5)) / non-party if permitted by a PD (r31.10(9)):
setting out extent of search made to locate documents required to disclose (r31.10(6)(a)):
must state believe extent reasonable in all the circumstances (PD 31 para 4.2(1)) +
draw attention to any limitations on extent for proportionality reasons + why adopted (PD 31 para 4.2(2))
+
certifying (i.e. signing) understands duty of disclosure + that, to best of his knowledge, he has carried it out (r31.10(6)(b), (c)):
if legally represented, legal rep must endeavour to ensure duty understood (PD 31 para 4.4)
+
if disclosing party = company, firm or association (including insurer / MIB) ID statement-maker (name, address, office / position, basis on which makes statement (PD 31 para 4.3)) + explain why appropriate person to make statement (r31.10(7))
if insurer / MIB has...
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our BPTC Civil Ligitation Notes.
A collection of the best BPTC notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find after combing through dozens of samples from outstanding students with the highest results in England and carefully evaluating each on accuracy, formatting, logical structure, spelling/grammar, conciseness and "wow-factor".
In short, these are what we believe to be the strongest set of BPTC notes available in the UK this year. This collection of BPTC notes is fully updated for recent exams, ...
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get Started