BPTC Law Notes BPTC Civil Ligitation Notes
A collection of the best BPTC notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find after combing through dozens of samples from outstanding students with the highest results in England and carefully evaluating each on accuracy, formatting, logical structure, spelling/grammar, conciseness and "wow-factor".
In short, these are what we believe to be the strongest set of BPTC notes available in the UK this year. This collection of BPTC notes is fully updated for recent exams, ...
The following is a more accessible plain text extract of the PDF sample above, taken from our BPTC Civil Ligitation Notes. Due to the challenges of extracting text from PDFs, it will have odd formatting:
WITNESS STATEMENTS AND AFFIDAVITS
TYPES OF WRITTEN EVIDENCE
witness statements (WS)
witness summaries
informal document summarising evidence witness expected to give at trial
NOT used for interim applications
must obtain permission from court to use + only appropriate if practical problem in witness signing formal statement
affidavits
fee payable when sworn
sworn before solicitor / someone authorised to take oaths (jurat not statement of truth)
affirmations = secular affidavit
statements of case
must contain statement of truth
may be used as evidence in interim application if verified by statement of truth (PD 32 para 26.1) BUT usually need to supplement
application notice
must contain statement of truth
most informal (+ common) way of adducing evidence on interim application
COURT'S GENERAL POWER TO CONTROL EVIDENCE
court may:
give directions as to issues on which it requires evidence, the nature of evidence required to decide them + the way evidence placed before court (r32.1(1))
exclude evidence that would otherwise be admissible (r32.1(2))
similar fact evidence
= witnesses all tell same story - must be telling truth (unless colluding)
admissible if:
substantially probative of issue(s) i.e. NOT only relevant to collateral matter; AND
no grounds why court should decline to admit
limit XX (r32.1(3))
gives court power to strike out scandalous, irrelevant or oppressive WS (used sparingly) (Sandhurst v Grosvenor)
AUTHENTICITY OF DISCLOSED DOCUMENTS
notice to admit facts (to narrow down issues) / produce documents
parties deemed to admit authenticity of documents disclosed to them
if wish to challenge, must serve notice to prove, which must specify documents being challenged + be served by latest date for serving witness statements OR within 7 days of disclosure (whichever is later) (r32.19)
notarial acts + instruments
can be received in evidence without further proof (unless contrary proved) (r32.20)
WITNESS STATEMENTS
definition
= a written statement signed by a person which contains the evidence which that person would be allowed to give orally (r32.4(1)
formal document - must contain statement of truth
court's power to control witness evidence
court may
give directions on witness evidence to: ID / limit issues, ID witnesses who may be called / evidence read + limit length / format of WSs (r32.2(3))
purpose: prevent excessive amounts of evidence
allow witness to give evidence via video link or any other means (r32.3)
trial
general rules
(unless rule, PD or court order requires otherwise) any fact required to be proved by WS to be proved by public oral evidence (r32.2(1))
evidence in chief at trial
where witness called, WS = evidence in chief (EIC) (unless court otherwise orders) (r32.5(2))
court may order otherwise if there are allegations of serious misconduct (JN Dairies)
witness giving oral evidence may amplify his WS + give evidence on new matters arising since service of WS IF the court gives permission, which it will only give if there is good reason NOT to confine evidence to WS (r32.5(3), (4))
exchange of WSs for use at trial
disclosure directions in fast + multi track cases
court will order party to disclose WS of witnesses party intends to call:
'court will order a party to serve on other parties any WS of the oral evidence which party serving intends to rely on in relation to any issues of fact to be decided at trial' (r32.4(2))
i.e. usually at allocation stage or CMC - court will give date by which WSs must be exchanged
sequential disclosure + whether to file
court may give directions on order the statements are to be filed in + whether or not they are to be filed (r32.4(3))
failure to serve
if fail to serve by date specified, witness CANNOT give oral evidence (unless court orders otherwise) (r32.10)
WS = properly served if signed (but NOT verified by statement of truth)
party may apply to enforce compliance / for sanctions (PD 28 para 5.1, PD 29 para 4.10)
court may strike out claim / defence (r3.4)
use at trial of WSs which have been served
if party has served a WS + wishes to rely on evidence of author at trial he party must call that witness (unless court orders otherwise OR he puts statement in as hearsay) (r32.5(1))
if party serves a WS and does NOT call witness / put WS in as hearsay any other party may put the WS in as hearsay (r32.5(5))
privilege
before disclosure, WS protected by legal professional privilege
by disclosing (serving) privilege waived (even if decide later NOT to call witness at trial) - hence r32.5(5)
XX
if witness gives oral evidence, may be XX on WS regardless of whether statement / part of it referred to during W's EIC
proceedings other than trial (i.e. interim applications)
general rule
(unless rule, PD or court order requires otherwise) any fact required to be proved by WS to be proved by written evidence (r32.2(2))
BUT party may rely on matters in SoC / application notice (if verified by statement of truth) (r32.5(2))
XX
if evidence given in writing, any party may apply to court for permission to XX person giving evidence (r32.7(1))
court may order witness to attend if convinced facts seriously challenged + good reasons to justify extra expense + delay
if permission granted and witness does NOT attend, evidence CANNOT be used (unless court gives permission) (r32.7(2))
availability of WSs for inspection by members of the public
general rule: WS standing as EIC / depositions given in evidence at trial (but NOT documents exhibited to WS - GIO Personal) is open to inspection during trial (unless court directs otherwise) (r32.13(1), r34.11(5))
any person may request direction that WS NOT open to inspection (32.13(2)) BUT court will NOT make a direction unless satisfied WS should NOT be open to inspection because of:
interests of justice
public interest
nature of expert medical evidence in WS
...
Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our BPTC Civil Ligitation Notes.
A collection of the best BPTC notes the director of Oxbridge Notes (an Oxford law graduate) could find after combing through dozens of samples from outstanding students with the highest results in England and carefully evaluating each on accuracy, formatting, logical structure, spelling/grammar, conciseness and "wow-factor".
In short, these are what we believe to be the strongest set of BPTC notes available in the UK this year. This collection of BPTC notes is fully updated for recent exams, ...
Ask questions 🙋 Get answers 📔 It's simple 👁️👄👁️
Our AI is educated by the highest scoring students across all subjects and schools. Join hundreds of your peers today.
Get Started