Pre Action Protocols Notes

PRE-ACTION PROTOCOLS

• co-operation facilitates settlement at early stage - encourage exchange of information and ADR

• departure from protocol must be explained to court, and may attract sanctions

• Apply to 3rd party and normal proceedings

• MoJ has published 12 pre-action protocols, and PD on pre-action conduct:

  1. Practice Direction - Pre-Action Conduct

  2. Pre-Action Protocol for PI Claims

  3. Pre-Action Protocol for Resolution of Clinical Disputes

  4. Pre-Action Protocol for the Construction and Engineering Disputes

  5. Pre-Action Protocol for Defamation

  6. Professional Negligence Pre-Action Protocol

  7. Pre-Action Protocol for JR

  8. Pre-Action Protocol for Disease and Illness Claims

  9. Pre-Action Protocol for Housing Disrepair Claims

  10. Pre-Action Protocol for Possession Claims based on Rent Arrears

  11. Pre-Action Protocol for Possession Claims based on Mortgage or Home Purchase Plan Arrears in respect of Residential Property

  12. Pre-Action Protocol for Low Value PI Claims in RTAs

  13. Pre-Action Protocol for Claims for Damages in Relation to the Physical State of a Commercial Property at Termination of a Tenancy (the Dilapidations Protocol)

PD ON PRE-ACTION CONDUCT (cases not covered by specific protocol)

The protocol

Annex A - applies to straightforward claims likely to be disputed

Annex C - guidance on instructing experts

Annex B - information to be provided in debt claims where C = business and D = individual

• Does not apply to

  • consent orders

  • most applications for directions by a fiduciary

  • without notice applications e.g. freezing orders

• Approach of the courts

  • court can take into account extent parties comply when giving case management directions - r3.1(4) and (5), r3.9(1)(e)

  • court expect parties to have complied

  • court may expect parties to explain non-compliance

  • court consider:

    • compliance in substance minor shortcomings ok

    • proportionality of steps v importance of matter

    • urgency of matter - if urgent, parties only expected to comply as far as reasonable

• Sanctions for non-compliance

  • court consider overall effect of non-compliance on other party

  • if court decides has been non compliance sanctions court may impose:

    • order of stay till steps done

    • order party at fault to pay costs proportionate to breach

    • order party at fault to pay costs on indemnity basis

    • if winning C at fault, deprive of interest on damages/reduce rate

    • if D at fault, increase interest on damages

    • pay money into court - r3.1(5)

• Principles governing pre-action conduct where no specific protocol

  • unless circumstances make it inappropriate, before starting proceedings parties should:

    • exchange sufficient info about matter to

      • allow them to understand each other's position

      • make informed decision about settlement and how to proceed

    • try to resolve

    • consider ADR, throughout proceedings

  • act reasonably and proportionately

    • costs should be proportionate to complexity of matter and money at stake

    • must not use PD tactically

• Exchanging information before starting proceedings

  • debt claims only - at any time before letter of claim, C should

    • provide details of how money can be paid

    • state that D can contact C to discuss repayment, including contact details

    • inform D that free debt advice is available and where from

  • C should set out details in letter of claim

    • give concise details to allow D to understand and investigate w/o needing to request further info:

      • letter should include

        • C's full name and address

        • basis on which claim made

        • summary of facts

        • remedy desired

        • if financial loss claimed explanation of how calculated

        • details of any funding arrangement of C

      • letter should also

        • list essential documents C intends to rely on

        • set out form of ADR, invite D to agree

        • state date C considers reasonable for D to respond by

        • ID and ask for copies of any relevant documents not in C's possession and which C wants to see

      • unless D known to be legally represented, letter should

        • refer D to PD pre-action conduct, especially sanctions for non-compliance

        • inform D that ignoring letter may lead to C starting proceedings and increase D's costs

  • D should provide full written response w/in reasonable period:

    • reasonable:

      • simple matter 14 days

      • 3rd party involved 30 days

      • complex matter 30+ days

      • exceptional circumstances 90+ days

    • if D cannot provide full response should provide - w/in 14 days - written acknowledgement instead:

      • state whether insurer involved

      • state date by which D / insurer will provide full written response

        • if later than that C stated as reasonable in letter of claim, D should give reasons

        • if C starts proceedings before this date, court consider whether period specified by D reasonable

      • may request further info to enable full response

      • if D cannot provide full response because intends to seek (debt) advice

        • state:

          • seeking (debt) advice

          • from whom

          • when D expects to have received advice

        • C should allow up to 14 days for D to obtain advice

        • debt claims only - BUT C need not allow D time if C knows:

          • D already received debt advice and circumstances haven't changed

          • D has previously requested time to seek debt advice and hasn't

    • full written response should

      • accept claim in whole / part; or

      • deny liability

      • if C accepts in part / denies liability, response should

        • give reasons, IDing which facts accepted / disputed and basis of dispute

        • state whether D will counterclaim (give details cf letter of claim)

        • state whether D alleges C wholly or partly to blame and summarise facts relied on

        • state if D agrees to C's suggestion of ADR and if not, suggest alternative

        • list essential documents D intends to rely on

        • enclose copies of documents requested by C / explain why not providing

        • ID and ask for copies of any relevant documents not in D's possession and which D wants to see

  • C should reply

    • provide documents requested by D ASAP / explain in writing why documents not provided

    • if D has counterclaimed, C should provide 'full written response'

  • if matter not resolved on completion of procedure, parties should review their positions to...

Buy the full version of these notes or essay plans and more in our BPTC Civil Ligitation Notes.